Determinan opini audit Going Concern: Financial Distress sebagai variabel moderasi menggunakan Logistics Regression Analysis

Yosafat Chrizar Ratu  Nagari; Dwi  Suhartini

doi:10.33395/owner.v6i4.1048

Authors

Yosafat Chrizar Ratu Nagari UPN Veteran Jawa Timur
Dwi Suhartini Universitas Pembangunan Nasional, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v6i4.1048

Keywords:

Auditor Switching, Leverage, Reputasi KAP, dan Penerimaan opini audit Going ConcernAuditor Switching, Leverage, Reputasi KAP, dan Penerimaan opini audit Going Concern

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of KAP reputation, auditor switching, leverage and financial distress in moderating the effect of KAP reputation, auditor switching, leverage on the acceptance of going concern audit opinions. The sample in this study is 103 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2017-2020 period which are classified based on Consumer Non-Cyclicals shares because they have the largest population compared to other sectors and these companies are more complex because they have to produce and sell finished goods. The sampling technique in this study uses purposive sampling method, namely the data required must have certain criteria, so that the obtained sample size is 15 companies (60 data). While the data collection technique in this study uses a documented approach, where the data in this study comes from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) at https://www.idx.co.id/ and the websites of each sample company. The analysis technique uses Logistic regression analysis using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 24 Version. The results of the analysis prove that there is no significant effect of KAP reputation and audit switching on going concern audit opinions; there is a significant effect of leverage on going concern audit opinion; there is no significant effect of financial distress strengthening the influence of KAP reputation and audit switching on going-concern audit opinion; and there is a significant effect of financial distress strengthening the effect of leverage on going-concern audit opinion. These results prove that financial distress functions as a moderating variable for leverage on going concern audit opinion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Ahyar, H., Maret, U. S., Andriani, H., Sukmana, D. J., Mada, U. G., Hardani, S.Pd., M. S., Nur Hikmatul Auliya, G. C. B., Helmina Andriani, M. S., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif (Issue March).

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market of Lemons: Qualitative Uncertainty and The Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

Akuntansi dan Pajak, J., Ningsih, S., & Fitri Permatasari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi AAS Surakarta, F. (2019). Model Zmijewski X-Score Untuk Memprediksi Financial Distress Pada Perusahaan Go Publik Sub Sektor Otomotif Dan Komponen. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 19(02), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.29040/JAP.V19I2.356

Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2005). Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. In Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118267806

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2015). Auditing & Jasa Assurance. Salemba Empat.

Brigham, E. F., & Gapenski, L. C. (1997). Financial management?: theory and practice / Eugene F. Brigham, Louis C. Gapenski (8th ed). The Dryden Press.

Byusi, H., & Achyani, F. (2018). Determinan Opini Audit Going Concern (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Real Estate Dan Property Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2013-2015). Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v3i1.5552

Chow, C. W., & Rice, S. J. (1982). Qualified Audit Opinion and Auditor Switching. The Accounting Review, 57(2), 326–335.

Darrough, M. N., & Stoughton, N. M. (1986). Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection: The Question of Financial Structure. The Jurnal of Finance, 41(2), 501–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2328450

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

Dolorosa, G. N. (2014). Januari 2015, Saham Davomas Delisting dari BEI. Market.Bisnis.Com. https://market.bisnis.com/read/20141223/192/385526/januari-2015-sahamdavomas-%0Adelisting-dari-bei

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/258191

Foster, B. P., & Shastri, T. (2016). Determinants of going concern opinions and audit fees for development stage enterprises. Advances in Accounting, 33, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.05.001

Gallizo, J. L., & Saladrigues, R. (2016). An analysis of determinants of going concern audit opinion: Evidence from Spain stock exchange. Intangible Capital, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.683

Gama, A. P., & Astuti, S. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penerimaan Opini Auditor Dengan Modifikasi Going Concern (Studi Empiris di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 9(1), 8–18.

POJK Nomor 13/POJK.03/2017. (n.d.). Retrieved February 16, 2022, from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/regulasi/peraturan-ojk/Pages/POJK-Penggunaan-Jasa-Akuntan-Publik-dan-Kantor-Akuntan-Publik-dalam-Kegiatan-Jasa-Keuangan.aspx

PT Bursa Efek Indonesia. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2022, from https://www.idx.co.id/

Regina, D., & Paramitadewi, H. D. S. L. (2021). Pengaruh Reputasi Kap, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Likuiditas, Solvabilitas, Dan Kondisi Keuangan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. BALANCE: Jurnal Akuntansi, Auditing Dan Keuangan, 18(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.25170/balance.v18i1.2306

Rohmadini, A., Saifi, M., & Darmawan, A. (2018). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas dan Leverage Terhadap Financial Distress (Studi Pada Perusahaan Food & Beverage Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2016). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 61(2), 11–19.

Rudyawan, A. P., & Badera, I. D. N. (2014). Opini Audit Going Concern: Kajian Berdasarkan Model Prediksi Kebangkrutan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Leverage, Dan Reputasi Auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(2), 1–17.

Saifudin, A., & Trisnawati, R. (2015). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitras, Likuiditas, Solvabilitas dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008-2009 ). Syariah Paper Accounting FEB UMS, 589–601.

Sanoran, K. (Lek). (2018). Auditors’ going concern reporting accuracy during and after the global financial crisis. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 14(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2018.05.005

Shockley, R. (1981). An of Auditors ’ Independence?: Analysis Empirical. The Accounting Review, 56(4), 785–800.

Solikhah, B., & K. (2010). Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan, Pertumbuhan Dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 2(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v2i1.1928

Swanson, Z. L., & Theis, J. (2015). Study of Going Concern Opinions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2660490

Tandelilin, E. (2010). Dasar-dasar Manajemen Investasi.

Wahyudin, A. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian: Penelitian Bisnis & Pendidikan. Unnes Press.

Wibisono, E. A. (2013). Prediksi Kebangkrutan, Leverage, Audit Sebelumnya, Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Going Concern Perusahaan Manufaktur BEI. Jurnal EMBA, 1(4), 362–373.

Yuliyani, N. M. A., & Erawati, N. M. A. (2017). Pengaruh Financial Distress, Proftabilitas, Leverage dan Likuiditas Pada Opini Audit Going Concern. EJurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 19(2), 1490–1520.

Zulfikar, M., & Syafruddin, M. (2013). Pengaruh Faktor Non Keuangan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 2(3), 1–13.