Penggunaan Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan
DOI:
10.33395/owner.v7i2.1325Keywords:
Financial statement fraud, fraud hexagonAbstract
This research aims to examine the fraud hexagon theory in the detection of fraudulent financial reporting that occurs in a company. According to the hexagon fraud theory, fraud occurs due to 6 factors, namely pressure/stimulus, opportunity, capability, ego/arrogance, rationalization, and collusion. These 6 factors are proxied with 10 proxies, namely: financial stability, financial targets, external pressure, change in director, change in auditor, ineffective monitoring, industry nature, number of CEO photos, political connections, and collusion. The population in this research are companies listed in the LQ 45 index period I February-July 2017-2021. The sample in this study is 88 samples. The data analysis approach used is statistic descriptive, classic assumption test, and multiple regression analysis using SPSS 25. The results of this study reveal that the nature of industry and external pressures have a negative effect on the detection of financial statement fraud, and change in auditor positively effect on the detection of financial statements fraud. While the variables of financial stability, financial targets, political connections, change in directors, number of CEO photos, ineffective monitoring, and collusion have no effect in detecting financial statements fraud. This result can be used for companies management as their references about what makes fraudulent financial statements occurs, so they can make preventive action for their companies
Downloads
Plum-X Analityc
References
Achmad, T., & Dapit Pamungkas, I. (2018). Fraudulent Financial Reporting Based of Fraud Diamond Theory: A Study of the Banking Sector in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi, 4(2), 135–150. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jiafe
Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013
Agusputri, H., & Sofie, S. (2019). Faktor - Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 14(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v14i2.5049
Antawirya, R. D. E. P., Putri, I. G. A. M. D., Wirajaya, I. G. A., Suaryana, I. G. N. A., & Suprasto, H. B. (2019). Application of fraud pentagon in detecting financial statement fraud. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(5), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n5.706
Aprilia, S. R. N. A., & Furqani, A. (2021). Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Metode Fraud Diamondpada Perusahaan Jasa. Journal of Accounting And Financial Issue, 2(2).
Asmah, A. E., Atuilik, W. A., & Ofori, D. (2020). Antecedents and consequences of staff related fraud in the Ghanaian banking industry. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2019-0034
Darmawan, A. (2017). The Impact of Auditor Quality, Financial Stability, and Financial Target for Fraudulent Financial Statement. Oktoria Saragih | Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 2(1), 9–14.
Fuad, K., Lestari, A. B., & Handayani, R. T. (2020). Fraud Pentagon as a Measurement Tool for Detecting Financial. 17th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2020), 85–88.
Haqq, A. P. N. A., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2020). Fraud Pentagon for Detecting Financial Statement Fraud. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i3.1788
imagama.feb.ugm.ac.id. (2020, 16 Oktober). Kasus Garuda Indonesia, RIwayatmu Kini. Diakses pada 7 September 2022, dari https://imagama.feb.ugm.ac.id/kasus-garuda-indonesia-riwayatmu-kini/.
Kurnia, A. A., & Anis, I. (2017). Analisis Fraud Pentagondalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Menggunakan Fraudscore Model. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XX.
Mulford, C. W., & Comiskey, E. E. (2010). Deteksi Kecurangan Akuntansi The Financial Number Game (Ramelan, Ed.). Penerbit PPM.
Octani, J., Dwiharyadi, A., & Djefris, D. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Selama Tahun 2017-2020. Jurnal Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Ekonomi Indonesia, 1(1), 36–49. https://akuntansi.pnp.ac.id/jabei
Rahman, A., Deliana, D., & Gopas, D. (2021). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Analisis Fraud Trianglepada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Kajian Akuntansi, 22(1).
Ramdany, R., Musfita, R., & Darwis, H. (2020). Analisa Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan?: Model Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, 19(2), 157–166.
Sari, S. P., & Nugroho, N. K. (2020). Financial Statements Fraud dengan Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model: Tinjauan pada Perusahaan Terbuka di Indonesia 26. 1st Annual Conference On Ihtifaz: Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking, 409–430.
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Advances in Financial Economics, 13, 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005
Subiyanto, B., Pradani, T., Tri, D., & Divian, N. (2022). Influence of External Pressure, Financial Stability, and Financial Target on Fraud Financial Reporting. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(2), 12012–12021. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5035
Sugiyono. (2016). Mertode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Vol. 23). Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sunardi, S., & Amin, M. N. (2018). Fraud detection of financial statement by using fraud diamond perspective. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(3), 878–891. www.isdsnet.com/ijds
Syahria, R. (2019). Detecting Financial Statement Fraud Using Fraud Diamond (A Study on Banking Companies Listed On the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2016). Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v4i2.114
Triyanto, D. N. (2019). Detection of Financial Reporting Fraud: The Case of Socially Responsible Firms. Journal of Economics, 22(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i3.1792
Utami, E. R., & Pusparini, N. O. (2019a). The Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory and Financial Distress for Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Banking Sector in Indonesia (Empirical Study of Listed Banking Companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2017). Atlantis Press, 102.
Utami, E. R., & Pusparini, N. O. (2019b). The Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory and Financial Distress for Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Banking Sector in Indonesia (Empirical Study of Listed Banking Companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2017). In 5th International Conference on Accounting and Finance (ICAF 2019) , 60–65.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs
www.cnbcindonesia.com. (2021, 27 Juli). Deretan Skandal Lapkeu di Pasar Saham Ri, Indofarma-Hanson!. Diakses pada 7 September 2022, dari https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20210726191301-17-263827/deretan-skandal-lapkeu-di-pasar-saham-ri-indofarma-hanson/3.
Yanti, L. D., & Riharjo, I. B. (2021). Pendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Pentagon Theory. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 10(5).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Didi Setyono, Eko Hariyanto, Sri Wahyuni, Bima Cinintya Pratama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.