Pemanfaatan AEOI untuk Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak High Wealth Individual dalam Program Pengungkapan Sukarela

Era Widi  Astuti; Yulianti  Abbas

doi:10.33395/owner.v7i4.1646

Authors

Era Widi Astuti Universitas Indonesia
Yulianti Abbas Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v7i4.1646

Keywords:

AEOI; Tax Compliance; High Wealth Individual; Voluntary Disclosure Program

Abstract

Utilization of Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) data is expected to be able to encourage taxpayers are willing to take part in the Voluntary Disclosure Program (PPS) by disclosing assets that have never been reported in the Annual Tax Return or Tax Amnesty. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AEOI in increasing High Wealth Individual (HWI) Taxpayer compliance during the PPS period at KPP X. This research is important to do because there are differences in the results between research conducted before and after the period of utilization of AEOI data by DGT starting in 2020. In addition, AEOI data, which is considered to be able to improve tax compliance, has several challenges in its utilization, namely data synchronization and rejection by taxpayers. The effectiveness of data utilization is measured using the CIPP Evaluation Model. This research is qualitative with a case study approach. Data collection was carried out through interviews with Account Representatives (AR) and analyzing the data and reports provided by KPP X. The results showed that there were several obstacles in the utilization of AEOI data, especially the accuracy of the data which required adjustments. Utilization of AEOI data effectively increases the participation of HWI Taxpayer in PPS. The tax paid by HWI Taxpayer who has AEOI data is higher than HWI Taxpayer who does not have AEOI data. This success was influenced by several factors, namely synergy and support from colleagues; high tax awareness and ability to pay and concrete power of AEOI data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2

Arifudin, R. (2006). trategi peningkatan kepatuhan pajak penghasilan wajib pajak orang pribadi untuk meningkatkan penerimaan pajak: studi kasus di KPP Jakarta Cengkareng.

Bisnis Indonesia. (2021). Menagih Komitmen Eksekusi Pertukaran Data Perpajakan. https://bisnisindonesia.id/article/menagih-komitmen-eksekusi-pertukaran-data-perpajakan

Casi, E., Spengel, C., & Stage, B. M. B. (2020). Cross-border tax evasion after the common reporting standard: Game over? Journal of Public Economics, 190, 104240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104240

Siaran Pers DJP Nomor SP- 46/2021: Bukan Sekadar Pengampunan Pajak , PPS Adalah Kesempatan, (2021).

Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor SE-05/PJ/2022 Tentang Pengawasan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, (2022).

Gadžo, S., & Klemen?i?, I. (2017). Effective international information exchange as a key element of modern tax systems?: promises and pitfalls of the OECD ’ s common reporting standard. Public Sector Economics, 41(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.41.2.3

Ilyas, W. B., & Burton, R. (2013). Hukum pajak?: Teori, analisis, dan perkembangannya (6th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan, 1 (2021).

Ispriyarso, B. (2020). Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) Dan Penghindaran Pajak. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.2.2020.172-179

James, S., & Alley, C. (2002). Tax Compliance , Self-Assessment and Tax Administration School of Business and Economics , University of Exeter. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 2(2), 27–42. http://hdl.handle.net/10036/47458

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 196/PMK.03/2021 Tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Program Pengungkapan Sukarela Wajib Pajak, 22 (2021).

Knight Frank Research. (2022). The Wealth Report:The Global Perspective on Prime Property & Investment. East. https://content.knightfrank.com/research/83/documents/en/the-wealth-report-2021-7865.pdf

OECD. (2001). Compliance Measurement – Practice Note Prepared. In Measurement.

OECD. (2022). Revenue Statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2022 ? Indonesia. OECD Tax Statistics (Database), 28. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/data/revenue-statistics-in-asia/papua-new-guinea_d2ecd822-en

OECD. (2012). Automatic Exchange of Information - What it is, How it works, Benefits, What remains to be done. OECD, 22. https://www.oecd.org/ctp/exchange-of-tax-information/automatic-exchange-of-information-report.pdf

Peter H. Rossi, Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation a systematic approach. In International Educational and Professional Publisher (Seventh). Sage Publications.

Salam, R. D. (2020). Efektivitas Pertukaran Informasi Secara Otomatis Dalam Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar.

Selvi, S. (2018). Automatic Exchange of Information Sebagai Big Data Di Bidang Perpajakan. Transparansi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 1(1), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.31334/trans.v1i1.144

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Supriyadi. (2019). Automatic Exchange of Information sebagai Sarana Meningkatkan Empat Pilar Kepatuhan Pajak. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi, 6(6), 118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31334/reformasi.v6i2.525.g335

Tarjo, & Kusumawati, I. (2006). Analisis perilaku wajib pajak orang pribadi terhadap pelaksanaan self assessment system suatu studi di Bangkalan. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 10(1), 101–120