Pengaruh Fraud Triangle terhadap Kecenderungan Fraud Anggaran Dana Desa dan Budaya Organisasi sebagai Variabel Moderasi: (Studi pada Pemerintah Desa di Kabupaten Sikka)

Elisabeth Yessi Da Rato; Lilis Ardini; Kurnia

doi:10.33395/owner.v7i4.1688

Authors

Elisabeth Yessi Da Rato Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia_Surabaya
Lilis Ardini Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia_Surabaya
Kurnia Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia_Surabaya

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v7i4.1688

Keywords:

Keywords: Fraud Triangle, Fraud Tendency of Village Funds Budget, Organizational Culture

Abstract

This research aimed to examine and analyze the effect of the fraud triangle which was referred to as pressure, opportunity, and rationalization on the fraud tendency of village funds budget, and organizational culture as moderating variable.

The research was qualitative. Moreover, the data collection technique used purposive sampling which the sample was based on the criteria given. In line with that, there were 60 samples from 147 villages in the Sikka district with a total of 240 respondents. Furthermore, the instrument in the sampling technique used the Slovin formula. Additionally, the data analysis technique used multiple linear regression with Moderated Regression Analysis (MSA) test.

As the result, it showed that: 1) pressure had a positive effect on the fraud tendency of the village funds budget, 2) opportunity had a positive effect on the fraud tendency of the village funds budget, 3) rationalization had a positive effect on the fraud tendency of the village funds budget, 4) organizational culture had a negative effect on fraud tendency of village funds budget, 5) organizational culture did not moderate the effect of pressure on the fraud tendency of village funds budget, 6) organizational culture did not moderate the effect of opportunity on the fraud tendency of village funds budget, 7) organizational culture did not moderate the effect of rationalization on the fraud tendency of village funds budget.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Abdullahi, R., dan N. Mansor. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent For Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences,5(4):38–45.

(2018). Fraud Prevention Initiatives in the Nigerian Public Sector. Journal of Financial Crime.

ACFE. (2016). http://acfe-indonesia.or.id/wpcontent/uploads/2017/07/ SURVAI-FRAUD-INDONESIA-2016.pdf. 26 Oktober 2022

Afsari,S.T. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan (Fraud) di Sektor Pemerintahan Berdasarkan Teori Fraud Triangle: Persepsi Pegawai Pemerintahan (Studi pada SKPD di Kabupaten Jember). Skripsi. Program Studi Strata 1 Akutansi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jember. Jember.

Apriani, N., Edy Sujana, S. E., dan Sulindawati, N. L. G. E. (2017). Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity, dan Rationalization terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris: Mahasiswa Akuntansi Program S1 Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 7(1).

Arles, L. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Pendorong Terjadinya Fraud: Predator Vs. Accidental Fraudster Diamond Theory Refleksi Teori Fraud Triangle (Klasik) Suatu Kajian Teoritis. Papper Ilmiah. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Riau: Riau.

Fitri dan Nadirsyah, N. (2020). Pengaruh Tekanan (Pressure), Kesempatan (Opportunity), Rasionalisasi (Rationalization), Dan Kapabilitas (Capability) Terhadap Kecurangan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Pemerintahan Aceh dengan Pemoderasi Budaya Etis Organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 5(1), 69-84.

Gazali, Y. P. (2021). Analisis Fraud Triangle dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Hasanuddin. Makassar.

Ghozali. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hasuti, A. T. A., dan Wiratno, A. (2020). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Tekanan, Kesempatan, Dan Rasionalisasi Terhadap Perilaku Korupsi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Akuntansi, 22(2), 113-123.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (IAI). (2001). Pernyataan Standar Auditing (PSA) No. 70 Standar Akuntansi (SA) Seksi 316.

Kusuma, I. C., Nurfitri, R., dan Mukmin, M.N. (2019). Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity, Rasionalization dan Capability terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi (Fraud). JurnalAkunida. 5(1) 54-68.

Machado, M. R. R., and Gartner, I. R. (2017). A hipótese de Cressey (1953) e a investigação da ocorrência de fraudes corporativas: uma análise empírica em instituições bancárias brasileiras. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 29, 60-81.

Maria, E. Gudono. (2017). Empirical Test Of Fraud Triangle Theory On Local Government (Evidence From Indonesia). International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(4), 233-248.

Wahyuni, R. (2016). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Kesesuaian Kompensasi dan Ketaatan Aturan Akuntansi terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi. Skripsi. Program Studi Akuntansi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. Jakarta

Widhiastuti, R., Utaminingtyas, T.H., dan Wahyuningsih, I. (2020). Determinants of Fraud Tendency in the Management of Village Funds, Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 4(50): 1482 – 1489.

Wirakusuma, I. G. B., dan Setiawan, P. E. (2019). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Kompetensi Dan Locus Of Control Pada Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(2), 1545-1569.