DEBT POLICY, EFFICIENCY RATIO, PROFITABILITY, AND SYSTEMATIC RISK: EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA
DOI:
10.33395/owner.v7i3.1690Keywords:
bankruptcy, financial healthiness, Kompas 100 index, polling data regression model, productive sectors, risky projectsAbstract
Systematic risk is relevant for investors in the stock transaction because portfolio creation cannot eliminate it. Thus, the influencing factors need to be recognized since the managers attempt to elevate the company value in the capital market, and this research exists to identify them. By denoting the previous research evidence, at least three determinants are available, i.e., debt policy, efficiency ratio, and profitability. The population comes from the consistent non-financial companies selected from the Kompas 100 index constituents in the Indonesian capital market between 2014 and 2019, where their total is 46. Moreover, the Slovin formula counts the samples with a fault boundary of 10%. Based on this formula, their sum is 32 companies, grabbed by a simple random sampling technique. Then, to analyze the data, this study applies the regression model with pooling data: the combination of time series and cross-sectional features. After testing the data, this investigation finds that the debt policy positively affects this risk; however, efficiency and profitability ratios negatively influence this risk. It implies that despite potential bankruptcy leading to higher systematic risk, the debt can effectively push the managers to use the cash flow for the necessary spending, resulting in revenue and profitability, despite taking on risky projects.
Downloads
Plum-X Analityc
References
Arora, L., Kumar, S., & Goel, U. (2019). Firm performance and systematic risk. The Second International Conference on Business, Management, and Economics, 63–79. https://doi.org/10.33422/2nd.icbmeconf.2019.06.1025
Awaluddin, M., Pratiwi, D., & Wardhani, R. S. (2019). The beta role in affecting stock returns with unconditional and conditional approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 5(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.24252/jiap.v5i1.9429
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principle of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Firdaus, F. (2021). Quantitative Research Methodology. CV. DOTPLUS Publisher.
Gujarati, D. N., Porter, D. C., & Pal, M. (2019). Basic Econometrics (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Ha, P. T. (2020). Impact of financial leverage, firm performance on systematic risk in developing countries: An analysis on the Vietnamese-listed firms. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.12691/jfa-8-1-2
Hartono, J. (2017). Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis (11th ed.). Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Jaafar, M. N., Muhamat, A. A., Basri, M. F., & Syed Alwi, S. F. (2020). Determinants of systematic risk: Empirical evidence from Shariah-compliant firms listed on Bursa Malaysia. International Business Education Journal, 13(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.vol13.1.6.2020
Jensen, G. R., & Jones, C. P. (2019). Investments: Analysis and Management (14th ed.). Wiley.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
Mousa, M., Nosratabadi, S., Sagi, J., & Mosavi, A. (2021). The effect of marketing investment on firm value and systematic risk. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010064
Nugraha, Y., & Firdaus, M. (2021). The analysis of leverage, liquidity, efficiency, and earning growth expectations impacts market beta. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 2(9), 1615–1631.
Parthasarathy, S. (2019). Systematic risk and accounting determinants: An empirical assessment in the Indian stock market. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 10(2), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2019.10.16
Riaz, A., Hongbing, O., & Mansoor, R. (2019). Systematic risk determinants of the Japanese shipping industry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 1030–1042. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i1/5503
Rowe, T. R., & Kim, J. S. (2010). Analyzing the relationship between systematic risk and financial variables in the casino industry. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 14(2), 47–58. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/grrj/vol14/iss2/4/
Saji, T. G. (2018). Predicting Market Betas: Implication from firms’ financials in India. Paradigm, 22(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971890718787942
Saravia, J. A., García, C. S., & Almonacid, P. M. (2021). The determinants of systematic risk: A firm lifecycle perspective. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(1), 1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1834
Tandelilin, E. (2017). Capital Market: Portfolio and Investment Management. Penerbit Kanisius.
Tigor, R. H., Indratjahyo, H., & Silitonga, E. S. (2021). Influence of return on assets and total assets turnover on the systematic risk of shares with price book value as intervening variable. Journal of Research in Business and Management, 9(2), 62–72. https://questjournals.org/jrbm/papers/vol9-issue2/I09026272.pdf
Titman, S., Keown, A. J., & Martin, J. D. (2021). Financial Management: Principles and Applications (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Wagdi, O., & Tarek, Y. (2019). The impact of financial risk on systematic risks: International evidence. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 9(6), 203–2016. https://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB/Vol 9_6_11b.pdf
Zutter, C. J., & Smart, S. B. (2018). Principles of Managerial Finance (15th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bram Hadianto, Herlina Herlina, Rosemarie Sutjiati Njotoprajitno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
