Peran Moderasi Religiusitas Terhadap Hubungan Antara Dimensi Fraud Pentagon Dengan Kecurangan Akademik

Lisda Ariani Simabur; Effendi M; Astri  Dwi Jayanti Suhandoko; Zainuddin Zainuddin

doi:10.33395/owner.v7i4.1751

Authors

Lisda Ariani Simabur Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, Indonesia
Effendi M Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, Indonesia
Astri Dwi Jayanti Suhandoko Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, Indonesia
Zainuddin Universitas Khairun, Ternate, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v7i4.1751

Keywords:

Academic Fraud, Fraud Pentagon, Religiosity, UPBJJ-UT, Ternate

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of the Pentagon dimension of fraud on academic fraud. The sample in this study was UPBJJ-UT Ternate students who were conducting lectures during the Covid-19 period as many as 134 respondents. The sampling technique in this study used a saturated sample. Methods of data collection using a questionnaire (questionnaire). Data analysis using path coefficient analysis with the help of the Smart PLS program. Based on the results of the research above, it can be concluded that 1) academic pressure affects academic fraud behavior; 2) opportunity does not affect academic fraud behavior; 3) rationalization affects academic fraud behavior; 4) the ability to influence academic fraud behavior; 5) personal ethics affect academic fraud behavior; Meanwhile, religiosity as a moderator does not affect the relationship between pressure, opportunity, rationalization, ability and personal ethics with academic fraud behavior. Although not large, based on the results of multi-group analysis, religiosity is proven to be moderate which will reduce the level of academic fraud. Religious students are more likely not to commit academic fraud, even though they are under pressure, have opportunities, rationalization, have abilities, and their ethics are still low. Efforts to prevent academic fraud that can be carried out at UPBJJ-UT Ternate include socialization activities that are classified as fraud and the sanctions, convincing students that fraud will be caught and will be announced, ensuring students are not in a situation where they work by fraud, showing evidence that all fraud is proven will be penalized, train students to be able to write without fraud and encourage students to have pride when acting under ethical teachings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

Author Biographies

Lisda Ariani Simabur, Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, Indonesia

Effendi M, Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, Indonesia

Astri Dwi Jayanti Suhandoko, Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, Indonesia

References

Abdullahi, R. & Mansor, N. 2015. Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory : Understading the convergent and divergent for future research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences,Vol. 5 (4) hal 38-45.

Albrecht, W. Steve, Albrecht, Chad O., Albrecht Conan C., & Zimbelman, Mark F. 2011. Fraud Examination (Fourth Edition). South-Western : USA.

Amalia U. T., & Nurkhin, A. 2018. Dimensi Diamond Fraud dan Penggunaan Smartphone Terhadap Academic Fraud dengan Religiusitas sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Economic Education Analysis Journal. 2(1), 1–18.

Anderman, Eric M., Cupp, Pamela K., & Lane Derek. 2010. Impulsivity and Academic Fraud. The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 78 (1) hal 135-150.

Becker, D’Arcy., Connolly, Janice., Lentz, Paula., & Morrison, Joline. 2006. Using the Business fraud triangle to predict academic dishonesty among business students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Vol. 10 (2) hal 37-54.

Bloddgood, James M., Turnley, William H., & Mudrack, Peter. 2008. The Influence of Ethics Instruction, Religiosity, and Intelegence on Fraud Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 82 hal 557-571.

Cizex, Gregory C. 2010. Fraud on Test : How to Do It, Detect It, and Prevent It. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Assocoates Inc. Publicher.

Cressey, D.R. 1950. The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust. American Sociological Review, Vol. 15 (6) hal 1-15.

Djaelani, Y., Zainuddin, Z., & Mokoginta, R. M. (2022). Academic fraud of students in the Covid-19 period: Testing with the Pentagon's fraud dimension. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(2), 414-422.

Dorminey, Jack, Fleming, A. Scott, Kranacher, M., & Riley, Richard A. 2010. Beyond the Fraud Triangle. The CPA Journal, Vol. 80 (7) hal 17-23.

Gbegi, D.O., & Adebisi, J.F. 2013. The New Fraud Diamond Model-How Can It Help Forensic Accountants in Fraud Investigation in Nigeria?. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, Vol 1 (4) hal 129138.

Kassem, Rasha, & Higson, Andrew. 2012. The New Fraud Triangle Model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciencs (JETEMS), Vol. 3 (3) hal 191-195.

Lou, Yung I., and Wang, Ming Long. 2009. Fraud Risk Factors of the Fraud Triangle Assessing The Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Ecocomics Research, Vol. 7 (2) hal 61-78.

Malgwi, Charles A., & Rakovski, Charter C. 2009. Comabting Academic Fraud: Are Students Reticent about Uncovering the Covert?. Journal Academic Ethics, Vol. 7 hal 207-209.

Manurung D.T.H. dan Hadian, N. 2013. Detection Fraud of Financial Statement with Fraud Triangle. Proceedings of the 23rd International Business Researcher Conference hal 18-20 di Marriot Hotel, Melbourne, Australia.

Mason, K. 2006. Student Integrity. Journal the Business Review, Vol. 6 (1) hal 297-300.

Matthew, K., Kakwezi, P., & Kayize, D. 2013. The Effects of Fraudulent Procurement Practices on Public Procurenment Performance. International Journal of Business and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 3.

McCabe, Donald L., Butterfield, K.D., & Trevino, L.K. 2006. Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Program: Prevalence, Causes, and Proposed Action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 5 (3) hal 294-305.

Morris, D.E. dan C., Killian. 2006. Do Accounting Students Cheat? A Study Examining Undergraduate Accounting Students’ Honesty and Perception of Dishonest Behavior. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, Vol. 5 (3) hal 375-393.

Naufal, Muhammad Dzaki dan Mimin Nur Aisyah. 2019. Pengaruh Fraud Triangel, Religiusitas, dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesi Vol. 8 Nomor 7.

Nonis dan Swift. 2001. An Examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 77 (2) hal 69-77.

Nora, Wong L.K., & Zhang, K.L. 2010. Motives of fraud among secondary students: The role og self-eficacy and peer influence. Asia Pasific Educatuin Review, Vol. 11 hal 573-584.

Rangkuti, Anna Armeini. 2011. Academic Fraud Behaviour of Accounting Students: A Case Study in Jakarta State University. In Educational Integrity: Culture and Values. Proceedings 5th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity hal 105-109. The University of Western Australia, 26-28 September 2011.

Ruankew, Thanasak. 2013. The Fraud Factors. International Journal of Management and Administrative Science (IJMAS), Vol. 2 (2) hal 01-05.

-----. 2016. Beyond the Fraud Diamond. International Journal of Business Management and Ecocomics Research (IJBMER), Vol. 7 (1) hal 474-476.

Sorunke, O.A., Omotoso, A.F., Azeez, M.F., & Alamu, N.E. 2014. Ethical Issues in Financial Reporting and Theories that drive them: A Discource. International Journal of Business and Common Market Studies, Vol 11 (2) hal 59-69.

Sorunke, Olukayode Abayomi. 2016. Personal Ethics and Fraudster Motivation:The Missing Link In Fraud Triangle and Fraud Diamond Theories. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, Vol. 6 (2) hal 159-165.

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Taradi, S.K., Taradi, Milan, & Dogas, Zoran. 2012. Croation Medical Students See Academic Dishonesty as an Acceptable Behaviour: A cross-sectional Multicampus Study. Journal Medical Ethics, Vol. 38 hal 376-379.

West, Tim., S., P. Ravenscroft, dan C., B. Shrader.2004. Fraud and Moral Judgement in the College Classroom: A Natural Experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 54 hal 173-183.

Widianingsih, Luky Patricia. 2013. Students Fraud Behaviors: The Influences of Fraud Triangle. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, Vol. 2 (2) hal 252-260.

Wolfe, D.T. dan Hermanson, D.R. 2004. The Fraud Diamond: Considering the four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, Vol. 74 (12) hal 38-42.

Zamzam, I., Mahdi, S., & Ansar, R. 2017. Pengaruh diamond fraud dan tingkat religiuitas terhadap kecurangan akademik (studi pada mahasiswa S-1 di lingkungan perguruan tinggi se kota Ternate). Akuntansi Peradaban, 3, 1–24.

Zito, Nicole Alisa. 2009. Engaging Middle School Students in School Work and its Effect of Fraud. Dissertation. Boston: Boston College University.