Pengaruh Logika Institusi, Indikator Kinerja Utama, dan Partisipasi Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Institusional

Auliya Akbar Robbani; Ika Sasti Ferina; Shelly Febriana Kartasari

doi:10.33395/owner.v8i2.2029

Authors

Auliya Akbar Robbani Universitas Sriwijaya
Ika Sasti Ferina Universitas Sriwijaya
Shelly Febriana Kartasari Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v8i2.2029

Keywords:

Indikator Kinerja Utama, Kinerja Institusional, Logika Institusi, Partisipasi Anggaran, Teori Kelembagaan Baru

Abstract

The Merdeka Learning Campus Merdeka Program is implemented in tertiary institutions by the government in order to build competent and quality human resources. This program is realized through performance indicators set by the government to improve their institutional performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of institutional logic, key performance indicators, and sentiments on institutional performance. Neo-Institutional Theory in the study of institution and organization underlies this study by explaining theoritically how institusion are formed, changed, and maintained in society. The method used is the Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares approach. Statistical testing in this study used the smart pls 3.0 application. Respondents who were involved in this study amounted to 237 employees who were employees of Sriwijaya University. The sampling method of this study used purposive sampling. Data collection techniques using a questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares. The results showed that partially Institutional Logic had an effect on Institutional Performance, Key Performance Indicators had an effect on Institutional Performance, Budget Participation had an effect on Institutional Performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Aleksandrov, E., Bourmistrov, A., & Grossi, G. (2020). Performance budgeting as a “creative distraction” of accountability relations in one Russian municipality. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(3), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2019-0164

Alsaid, L. A. Z. A., & Ambilichu, C. A. (2021). The influence of institutional pressures on the implementation of a performance measurement system in an Egyptian social enterprise. In Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management (Vol. 18, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2020-0027

Amir, A. M., Ridwan, Din, M., Yamin, N. Y., Zahra, F., & Firman, M. F. (2020). The role of budget participation in improving managerial performance. Accounting, 7(2), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.12.004

Amos, D., Au-Yong, C. P., & Musa, Z. N. (2020). Developing key performance indicators for hospital facilities management services: a developing country perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(9), 2715–2735. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2019-0642

Beer, H. A., & Micheli, P. (2017). How performance measurement influences stakeholders in not-for-profit organizations. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37(9), 1164–1184. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2015-0481

Carlsson-Wall, M., Kraus, K., & Messner, M. (2016). Performance measurement systems and the enactment of different institutional logics: Insights from a football organization. Management Accounting Research, 32, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.01.006

Degenhart, L., Da Silva Zonatto, V. C., & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2022). Effects of psychological capital and managerial attitudes on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 33(89), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202113790

El-Saleh, A. A., Alhammadi, A., Shayea, I., Alsharif, N., Alzahrani, N. M., Khalaf, O. I., & Aldhyani, T. H. H. (2022). Measuring and Assessing Performance of Mobile Broadband Networks and Future 5G Trends. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020829

Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2018). Hybridizing the institutional logics of performance improvement and budgetary stewardship in English and Welsh local government. Public Policy and Administration, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718781433

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 Ed. 9, Cet. IX. //digilib.usm.ac.id%2Ffek%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D2134

Gisele, C. dos S., Carlos, A. G. B., & Luiz, E. G. (2020). Health service in Brazilian private and public hospitals: Budgetary participation, feedback and performance from clinical managers perception. African Journal of Business Management, 14(11), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm2020.9068

Grossi, G., Dobija, D., & Strzelczyk, W. (2020). The Impact of Competing Institutional Pressures and Logics on the Use of Performance Measurement in Hybrid Universities. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(4), 818–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1684328

Guarini, E., Magli, F., & Francesconi, A. (2020). Academic logics in changing performance measurement systems: An exploration in a university setting. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 17(1), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-06-2019-0076

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1

Huang, M. J., Cheng, K. C., Chung, S. H., Wang, H. M., & Wang, K. H. (2021). Budget participation capacity configuration (Bpcc), budgeting participation requirement and product innovation performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105614

Hutama, R. S., & Yudianto, I. (2019). The Influence of Budget Participation, Budget Goals Clarity and Internal Control Systems Implementation on Local Government Performance. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 2(2), 58–76. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jaab

Järvenpää, M., & Länsiluoto, A. (2016). Collective identity, institutional logic and environmental management accounting change. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 12(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2013-0094

Jonsson, H., & Rudberg, M. (2017). KPIs for measuring performance of production systems for residential building: A production strategy perspective. Construction Innovation, 17(3), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-06-2016-0034

Kallio, K. M., Kallio, T. J., & Grossi, G. (2017). Performance measurement in universities: ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators. Public Money and Management, 37(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1295735

Kallio, K. M., Kallio, T. J., Grossi, G., & Engblom, J. (2021). Institutional logic and scholars’ reactions to performance measurement in universities. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(9), 104–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3400

Karim, N. H., Abdul Rahman, N. S. F., Md Hanafiah, R., Abdul Hamid, S., Ismail, A., Abd Kader, A. S., & Muda, M. S. (2021). Revising the warehouse productivity measurement indicators: ratio-based benchmark. Maritime Business Review, 6(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-03-2020-0018

Kohlberg, L. (1983). Moral stages?: a current formulation and a response to critics. Karger. https://archive.org/details/moralstagescurre0000kohl

Ku, S., & Kim, C. (2020). Development of a model for maintenance performance measurement: A case study of a gas terminal. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 26(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-07-2018-0060

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2015). Breaking the Rules: A Historical Overview of Goal-Setting Theory. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2015.05.001

Natania, G. A. M. R., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2021). The Effect of Participation in Budgeting on the Performance of Regional Government Officials with Organizational Commitment as a Moderation Variable. 6, 66–71.

Pakpahan, R., & Augustine, Y. (2019). Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment And Job Performance On An Indonesian National Police Hospital. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 19(5), 334–341.

Polzer, T. (2022). “What is going on in the ‘big tent’?” Current developments in (new) institutional theory and performance measurement and management research. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34(6), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2021-0145

Richard Scott, W. (2014). INSTITUTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS FOURTH EDITION.

Sawada, Y., & Taguchi, S. (2021). Unintended Consequences of Budget Participation and Performance Misreporting?: An Experimental Study. March, 1–53.

Shields, R., & Watermeyer, R. (2020). Competing institutional logics in universities in the United Kingdom: schism in the church of reason. Studies in Higher Education, 45(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1504910

Uddin, S., Popesko, B., Papadaki, Š., & Wagner, J. (2021). Performance measurement in a transitional economy: unfolding a case of KPIs. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(2), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2019-4231

Ukoette Jeremiah Ekah, & Joel Iloke. (2022). Performance Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators for UMTS Networks in Calabar, Nigeria. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(1), 047–052. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2022.10.1.0023

Widiawati, D., & Yanuar RS, T. (2019). Effect of Budget Participation on Managerial Performance Mediated By Job Satisfaction and Organizational. Journal of Business Studies, 04(1), 1–13.

Zonatto, V. C. da S., Nascimento, J. C., Lunardi, M. A., & Degenhart, L. (2020). Effects of Budgetary Participation on Managerial Attitudes, Satisfaction, and Managerial Performance. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(6), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2020200047