Penerapan BEPS Action Plan 4 sebagai Penangkal Penghindaran Pajak melalui Pembebanan Biaya Pinjaman

Havidz Ibrahim; Dahlia Sari

doi:10.33395/owner.v8i2.2043

Authors

Havidz Ibrahim Universitas Indonesia
Dahlia Sari Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v8i2.2043

Keywords:

BEPS Action Plan 4, Interest Deduction, Interest Limitation, Tax Avoidance, Thin Capitalization Rule

Abstract

Since 2015, the government has enacted an interest limitation rule to prevent excessive interest deduction and tax avoidance. However, this regulation is not aligned with the BEPS Action Plan 4 released by the OECD. Previous research had been conducted quantitatively to measure the effectiveness of the current interest limitation rule in Indonesia. However, the result still inconclusive. Some research concluded that the current interest limitation rule is effectively impacted the tax avoidance, while other research concluded otherwise. Furthermore, previous research suggested the importance of future research concerning the BEPS Action Plan 4 implementation in Indonesia. In order to fill the gap, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the current regulation in Indonesia and provide ideal recommendations for implementing the BEPS Action Plan 4 to prevent tax avoidance. The research uses qualitative methods, including case studies and data acquisition techniques like interviews and document analysis. The study found that the current interest limitation rule in Indonesia is not effective in preventing tax avoidance. The OECD's BEPS Action Plan 4 recommendations are considered more effective as an anti-tax avoidance model. The ideal approach for implementation in Indonesia is the mandatory fixed ratio rule method based on EBITDA, with a de minimis threshold. The recommended ratio aligns with the OECD's recommendations, but should be periodically updated according to economic conditions. This approach should apply to both single entities and taxpayers who are group members.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Afifah, S. N., & Prastiwi, D. (2019). Pengaruh Thin Capitalization terhadap penghindaran pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi AKUNESA.

Alfansyur, A., & Mariyani. (2020). Seni Mengelola Data: Penerapan Triangulasi Teknik, Sumber dan Waktu pada Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial. HISTORIS: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 146-150.

Bachriansyah, B. I., Wulansari, D., & Halim, A. (2020). Analisis Penggunaan Debt to Equity Ratio sebagai Aturan Pembatasan Pembebanan Bunga Pinjaman untuk Tujuan Perpajakan di Indonesia. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

BPS. (2023, April 8). Badan Pusat Statistik. Retrieved from Badan Pusat Statistik: https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/13/1070/1/realisasi-pendapatan-negara.html

CNBC Indonesia. (2022, Juli 19). CNBCIndonesia.com. Retrieved from CNBC Indonesia: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20220719173235-4-356828/sadar-rasio-pajak-ri-masih-rendah-sri-mulyani-lakukan-ini

Darma, S. S., Ismail, T., Zulfikar, R., & Lestari, T. (2022). Tax Avoidance Towards Tax Ratio after Tax Amnesty Program. Jurnal Untirta.

Darussalam, & Septriadi, D. (2017). Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda Panduan, Interpretasi, dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: DDTC Publisher.

Hajawiyah, A., Suryarini, T., Kiswanto, & Tarmudji. (2021). 2021. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 100415 - 100425.

Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 127-178.

Haufler, A., & Runkel, M. (2012). Firm’s Financial choices and thin capitalization rules under corporate tax competition. European Economic Review, Volume 56, Issue 6, August, 1087-1103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.005.

Heriyanto. (2018). Thematic Analysis sebagai Metode Menganalisa Data untuk Penelitian Kualitatif. ANUVA Volume 2 (3), 317-324.

Jatmiko, V. B. (2018). Pengaruh Pemberlakuan Thin Capitalization Rule terhadap Pilihan Struktur Modal. TESIS FEB PPIE, UI.

Jayasupana, P. (2017). Indonesia's Thin Capitalization Rules, BEPS Project Objectives and Firm's Capital Structure. Tilburg: Tesis. Tilburg University.

Kayis-Kumar, A. (2016). International tax planning by multinationals: Simulating a tax-minimising intercompany response to the OECD's recommendation on BEPS Action 4. Munich Personal RePec Archive.

Kayis-Kumar, A. (2016). Thin Capitalization Rules: a second-best solution to the cross-border debt bias? Munich Personal RePec Archive.

Kayis-Kumar, A. (2016). What's BEPS got to do with it? Exploring the effectiveness of thin capitalization rules. Munich Personal RePec Archive.

Kurniawan, A. M. (2018). Pengaturan Pembebanan Bunga Untuk Mencegah Penghindaran Pajak. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara.

Lim, Y. (2010). Tax Avoidance, Cost of debt and Shareholder activism: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Banking & Finance, 456-470.

Mahardika, R., & Irawan, F. (2022). The impact of thin capitalization rules on tax avoidance in Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia.

Mawardi, Y. (2017). Analisis Rencana Aksi 4 BEPS atas ketentuan pembatasan beban bunga sebagai penangkal penghindaran pajak (suatu kajian atas regulasi Indonesia dan jepang). Jakarta: Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.

OECD. (2015). Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments, Action 4 - 2015 Final Report. Paris: OECD-Publishing.

Puspitasari, M. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Kerangka Inklusif Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) pada Peraturan Perpajakan Indonesia . Tesis, MAKSI UI.

Rahayu, N. (2008). Praktik Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance) pada Foreign Direct Investment yang Berbentuk Subsidiary Company (PT. PMA) di Indonesia (Suatu Kajian Tentang Kebijakan Anti Avoidance). Disertasi, Universitas Indonesia.

Rosid, A., & Daholi, T. H. (2018). Tax Design and Administration in a Post-BEPS Era: Key Reform Measures in Indonesia. Social Science Research Network.

Rosid, A., & Faisal. (2022). Thin Capitalization rules, capital structure, tax avoidance, and the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from indonesian listed firms. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 191-202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v5i2.1684.

Rulman, A. (2017). Thin Capitalization in Indonesia: Should Indonesia Follow OECD BEPS Project Recommendation on Thin Capitalization? Tilburg: Tesis. Tilburg University.

Salwah, S., & Herianti, E. (2019). Pengaruh aktivitas thin capitalization terhadap penghindaran pajak. Jurnal Riset Bisnis.

Sari, A. L., & Nuryanah, S. (2023). Analisis Sengketa Pajak atas Pembatasan Perbandingan Utang dan Modal Perusahaan. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 203-224 Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v23i2.16956.

Sari, D. (2019). Praktik Penghindaran Pajak Internasional dan Karakteristik Sistem Perpajakan Negara: Analisis Lintas Negara Berkembang di Asia. Disertasi, Universitas Indonesia.

Sisko, A. F. (2019). Penerapan DER rule dalam menangkal thin capitalization menggunakan arm's length approach (studi kasus pada PT X Tahun Fiskal 2015). Tesis, MAKSI UI.

Syahidah, S., & Rahayu, N. (2018). Thin Capaitalization Rules di Indonesia Studi Kasus pada RS “X” . Jurnal PKN STAN.

Taylor, G., & Richardson, G. (2013). The Determinants of Thinly Capitalized Tax Avoidance Structures: Evidence from Australian Firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 12-25.

Winardi, R. D., Bastian, I., & Fatmawati, D. (2019). Metoda Wawancara. 1-43.

Worokinasih, S., Kumalasari, K. P., & Alfandia, N. S. (2022). Basic Research OECD Framework untuk menanggulangai BEPS (Studi komparasi Indonesia Malaysia). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan - Fair Value.