Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory dalam Perilaku Academic Fraud: Studi Explanatory pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi

Putri Arini Moorcy; Sarwani Sarwani; Achmad  Suhaili; Rasidah Rasidah

doi:10.33395/owner.v8i1.2068

Authors

Putri Arini Moorcy Magister Akuntansi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Sarwani Sarwani Magister Akuntansi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Achmad Suhaili Magister Akuntansi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Rasidah Rasidah Magister Akuntansi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v8i1.2068

Keywords:

Academic fraud, Fraud hexagon, Opportunity, Pressure, Rationalization

Abstract

Fraudulent behavior has become the center of attention recently. Fraud also occurs in the academic world, better known as academic fraud. The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze the influence of (1) pressure on academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Banjarmasin; (2) opportunity to academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Banjarmasin; (3) rationalization to academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Banjarmasin; (4) capability to academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Banjarmasin; (5) ego to academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Banjarmasin; and (6) collusion to academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Banjarmasin. The population of this study is 2,404 accounting students in PTN or PTS in Banjarmasin. At the same time, the sample of this study was derived based on Yount’s sampling percentage table. There are 120 students determined as the sample. The data were collected by deploying a google form questionnaire to the respondents. The data was then analyzed using the multiple linear regression method. This study concludes that only rationalization and capability significantly influence the academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Banjarmasin. At the same time, the other elements of fraud hexagon, such as pressure, opportunity, ego, and collusion did not significantly influence the academic fraud behavior of accounting students in Banjarmasin. The results of the research serve as input for academics to improve the learning system and make efforts to minimize opportunities for academic fraud by students. These efforts can be made by improving the control system during exams and self-assessment assignments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. 2008. Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol 7 No. 4. Pp. 221–233.

Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. 2015. fraud Triangle Theory and fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent For Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences. Vol 5 No. 4. Pp. 110-120.

Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior (2nd ed.). Open University Press.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice-Hall.

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. 2016. fraud Examination (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Allan, R. 2003. fraud-The human face of fraud: Understanding the suspect is vital to any investigation. CA Magazine-Chartered Accountant. Vol. 136 No. 4. Pp. 39–40.

Apriani, N., Sujana, E., & Sulindawati, G. E. 2017. Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity, dan Rationalization terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris?: Mahasiswa Akuntansi Program S1 Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha. Vol. 7 No. 1. Pp. 121– 133.

Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, J. 2006. Using the Business fraud Triangle to Predict Academic Dishonesty among Business Students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal. Vol. 9 No. 2. Pp. 100-110.

Billy, B., Andrianus, A., Yuliati, R., & Adelina, Y. E. 2019. Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Berdasarkan Perspektif fraud Diamond. Ekspansi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan Dan Akuntansi. Vol. 11 No. 2. Pp. 157–178.

Cressey, D. R. 1950. The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust. American Sociological Review. Vol. 15 No. 6. Pp. 738–743.

Febriana, N. R. 2020. Analisi Pengaruh Dimensi fraud Pentagon Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Pada Uji Kompetensi. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp 500-520.

Ghozali, I. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (8th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I. 2018. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hartono, J. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman-Pengalaman. Yogyakarta: Andi Offiset.

Imtikhani, L., & Sukirman. 2021. Determinan fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Perspektif fraud Hexagon Theory Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis. Vol.19 No. 1. Pp. 96–113.

Indriartoro, N., & Supomo, B. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, Cetakan Kedua. Yogyakara; Penerbit BFEE UGM.

Irawan, M. 2017. Pengaruh fraud Pentagon Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi Angakatan Tahun 2015 Universitas Negeri Semarang. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Vol. 6 No. 11. Pp. 951–952.

Kock, N., & Davison, R. 2003. Dealing with plagiarism in the information systems research community: A look at factors that drive plagiarism and ways to address them. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. Vol. 27 No. 4. Pp. 511–532.

Kunisawa, T., Nagata, O., Nomura, M., Iwasaki, H., & Ozaki, M. 2004. A comparison of the absolute amplitude of motor evoked potentials among groups of patients with various concentrations of nitrous oxide. Journal of Anesthesia. Vol. 18 No. 3. Pp. 181–184.

Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. 2001. An Examination of the Relationship Between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 77 No. 2. Pp. 69–77.

Pramudyastuti, O. L., Fatimah, A. N., & Wilujeng, D. S. 2020. Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi: Investigasi Dimensi fraud Diamond. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology. Vol. 3 No. 2. Pp. 147–153.

Puspitha, M. Y., & Yasa, G. W. 2018. fraud Pentagon Analysis in Detecting fraudulent Financial Reporting (Study on Indonesian Capital Market). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research. Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 100-110.

Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. 2015. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Santoso, M. H., & Adam, H. 2012. Analisis Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Dengan Menggunakan Konsep fraud Triangle (Studi pada Mahasiswa S1 Akuntansi Kota Malang). Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis. Vol. 30. No. 2. Pp. 50-70.

Sorunke, O. A. 2016. Personal Ethics and fraudster Motivation: The Missing Link in fraud Triangle and fraud Diamond Theories. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. Vol. 6 No. 2. Pp. 120-140.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tuanakotta, T. M. 2010. Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Vousinas, G. 2019. Advancing Theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E Model. Journal of Financial Crime. Vol. 26 No. 1. Pp. 130-150.

Winardi, R. D., Mustikarini, A., & Anggraeni, M. A. 2017. Academic Dishonesty Among Accounting Students: Some Indonesian Evidence. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia. Vol. 14 No. 2.Pp. 142–164.