Analysis of Administrative Penalty for Late Issuing Tax Invoices in Indonesia: A Comparative Study from Vietnam

Siti Khodijah; Haula Rosdiana

doi:10.33395/owner.v8i2.2314

Authors

Siti Khodijah Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Haula Rosdiana Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v8i2.2314

Abstract

This study analyzes and compares the administrative penalty for late issuing tax invoices between Indonesia and Vietnam. The existence of a penalty has not been a driving factor for taxpayers to fulfill their tax obligations. Article 14 paragraph (4) General Provisions and Tax Procedures Law regulates the tax penalty for late issuing tax invoices, the same as for those who do not issue invoices. The administrative penalty needs to be analyzed more and compared with other countries' practices. VAT penalty cannot necessarily increase the compliance of taxable entrepreneurs. This research uses primary and secondary data sources for the qualitative method. The results of this study indicate that tax penalties should be designed by looking at the level of taxpayer error. Vietnam has no administrative penalty for the late issue of tax invoices but differentiates more penalties for tax invoices according to the level of violation. Tax penalties in Indonesia should be designed by considering the level of taxpayer violation, as Vietnam regulates. Administrative penalties for late tax invoices should not be the same as those imposed on taxpayers who did not issue tax invoices. The study recommends that tax authorities re-design the administrative penalties policy regarding tax invoice violations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Anggara, S. (2016). Hukum Administrasi Perpajakan. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford.

CNBC. (2023, Mei 26). Penerimaan Pajak RI Tembus Rp 688 T, Bisa Lewati Rekor 2022? https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20230526072752-128-440754/penerimaan-pajak-ri-tembus-rp-688-t-bisa-lewati-rekor-2022.

Caragher, J. (2023, Juni 6). How many countries have VAT or GST? 175. https://www.vatcalc.com/global/how-many-countries-have-vat-or-gst-174/: https://www.vatcalc.com/ .

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Sage Publication, Inc.

DGT. (2022). Annual Report 2022. Jakarta: The Directorate General of Taxes.

DGT. (2014). Annual Report 2014. Jakarta: The Directorate General of Taxes.

DGT. (2015). Annual Report 2015. Jakarta: The Directorate General of Taxes.

DGT. (2016). Annual Report 2016. Jakarta: The Directorate of General Taxes.

DGT. (2017). Annual Report 2017. Jakarta: The Directorate General of Taxes.

DGT. (2018). Annual Report 2018. Jakarta: The Directorate General of Taxes.

DGT. (2019). Annual Report 2019. Jakarta: The Directorate General of Taxes.

DGT. (2020). Annual Report 2020. Jakarta: The Directorate General of Taxes.

DGT. (2021). Annual Report 2021. Jakarta: The Directorate General of Taxes.

Flood, J., & Rowell, G. (2017). Tax Penalties. Inggris: Sweet and Maxwell.

Fonoa. (2023, March 16). Vietnam E-invoicing & Digital Reporting Guide. https://www.fonoa.com/countries/vietnam/e-invoicing-and-digital-reporting.

Giesecke, J., & Tran, N. (2012). A general framework for measuring VAT compliance rates. Applied Economics, 44, 1867–1889.

Gordon, R. (1996). Law of Tax Administration and Procedure. In V. T. (Ed.), Tax Law Design and Drafting. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Indikator. (2022). Persepsi dan Kepatuhan Publik Membayar Pajak. Jakarta: Indikator.

Jantscher, M. C., & Silvani, C. (1991). Guidelines for Administering a VAT. In A. A. Tait, Value-Added Tax Administrative and Policy Issues (pp. 30-39). International Monetary Fund.

Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2007). VAT Fraud and Evasion: What Do We Know, and What Can be Done?. IMF Working Paper WP/07/31. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Kumar, S., Nagar, A. L., & Samanta, S. (2007). Indexing the effectiveness of tax administration. Economic and Political Weekly, 42 (50), 104-110.

Iswahyudi, H. (2018). Where has the money gone?: The case of Value Added Tax revenue performance in Indonesia. MPRA Paper No. 89876.

Law No. 8/1983. (1983, December 31). Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1983 Concerning Value-Added Tax on Goods and Services and Sales Tax on Luxury Goods.

Law No. 16/2000. (2000, August 2). Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2000 Concerning The Second Amendment of Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 1983 Concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures.

Law No. 9/1994. (1994, November 9). Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 1994 Concerning The Amendment of Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 1983 Concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures.

Law No. 28/2007. (2007, July 17). Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2007 Concerning The Third Amendment of Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 1983 Concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures.

Law No. 6/1983. (1983, December 31). Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 1983 Concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures.

Law No. 7/2021. (2021, October 29). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2021 concerning the Harmonisation of Tax Regulations.

Lopez-Luzuriaga, A., & Scartascini, C. (2019). Compliance spillovers across taxes: The role of penalties and detection. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 164, 518–534.

Maroni. (2015). Pengantar Hukum Pidana Administrasi. Lampung: AURA.

Media Keuangan. (2024, January 2). Kinerja APBN 2023 Luar Biasa, Capai Target Lebih Cepat dan Sehatkan Ekonomi Nasional Artikel ini telah tayang di situs Media Keuangan | MK+ dengan judul "Kinerja APBN 2023 Luar Biasa, Capai Target Lebih Cepat dan Sehatkan Ekonomi Nasional - Media Keuanga. https://mediakeuangan.kemenkeu.go.id/article/show/kinerja-apbn-2023-luar-biasa-capai-target-lebih-cepat-dan-sehatkan-ekonomi-nasional.

Mengden, A. (2023). International tax competitiveness index 2023 (10th Edition). Tax Foundation.

Ministry of Finance. (2024). Portal Data APBN: Data Penerimaan Negara. https://data-apbn.kemenkeu.go.id/data-series?akun=934c49c5-fdd5-4522-939a-74a067b20199&dari_tahun=2014&sampai_tahun=2023.

Morris, D. (2010). Tax Penalties and Deterrence: Determining Effectiveness and Taxpayer Perception. The CPA Journal, Taxation, Compliance and Enforcement, September 2010.

Mulyana, A. N. (2020). Sanksi Pajak Berbasis Penerimaan Negara. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Neuman, W. (2014). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Nguyen, T. H. (2022). The impact of non-economic factors on voluntary tax compliance behavior: a case study of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam. Economies 10:179. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/economies10080179 .

OECD. (2023b). Revenue statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2023.

OECD. (2023a). Revenue statistics in asia and the pacific 2023 ? Indonesia. https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/revenue-statistics-asia-and-pacific-indonesia.pdf.

OECD. (2022). Revenue Statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2022: Strengthening Tax Revenues in Developing Asia. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Oun, M., & Bach, C. (2014). Qualitative research method summary. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 252-258.

Rahayu, S. (2010). Perpajakan Indonesia: konsep dan aspek formal. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Remmelink, J. (2003). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Rosdiana, H., Tambunan, M., & Inayati. (2020). Penyempurnaan hukum formal perpajakan terkait tata cara perpajakan. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 22, No. 2, Agustus, 215-240.

Saptono, P. B., Khozen, I., & Ayudia, C. (2021). Main Issues of Value-Added Tax Dispute in Indonesia: A note from 2019 tax court decrees. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 5 (2), 225-242.

Septiani, R. (2015). Penerapan Sanksi Administrasi terhadap pelanggaran wajib Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN). Lex Administratum, Vol. III/No.1/Jan-Mar/2015, 39-50.

Setyowati, M. S., Utami, N. D., Saragih, A. H., & Hendrawan, A. (2020). Blockchain Technology Application for Value-Added Tax Systems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

Soemitro, R. (1991). Pajak Ditinjau Dari Segi Hukum. Bandung: PT Eresco.

Sulfan. (2021). Kinerja PPN di Indonesia Tahun 2011-2020 . Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, 5 (2), 206-2016.

Tait, A. (1988). VAT: international practice and problem. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

Tait, A. A. (1988). Evasion, Enforcement, and Penalties. In A. A. Tait, Value Added Tax: International Practice and Problems. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Titaailla, V. A., & Fidiana, F. (2022). Tax compliance in Indonesia: a meta-analysis. Finance & Economics Review, 4(2).

Thuronyi, V. (1996). Tax law design and drafting. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Vu, T. (2020, November 13). Vietnam Issues Penalties for Violations in Tax and Invoicing: Decree 125. https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/vietnam-issues-penalties-for-violations-tax-invoicing-decree-125.html/.

Wijaya, S., & Arifianto, C. (2021). Tinjauan sanksi administrasi keterlambatan pembuatan faktur pajak. Jurnal Media Mahardhika, 20 (1), September 2021.

Wijaya, H. P. (2023). Implications of the implementation of the tax administrative sanctions policy on taxpayer compliance . Global Legal Review, 3 (2), October 2023, 109-126.

Wijaya, S., & Surbakti, S. P. (2024). Determinants of the VAT gap in The European Union: An empirical evidence with corruption control as a moderating variable. EDUCORETAX Volume 4 No. 1.

Wu, S.-Y., & Teng, M.-J. (2005). Determinants of tax compliance — a cross-country analysis. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis , 61 (3), 393-417.

Yamin, L., & Putranti, T. (2011). Model penyelewengan pajak menggunakan faktur pajak fiktif. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, Vol. 16 No. 1, Article 1.