Evaluasi Strategi Fraud Prevention Dengan Menggunakan COSO Fraud Risk Management

Authors

  • Harto Damedo Sidabutar Maksi-PPAk, Universitas Indonesia
  • Lufti Julian Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v8i4.2425

Keywords:

Corruption; Fraud Prevention; Fraud Risk; Fraud Risk Management; Segregation of Duties

Abstract

The rise of corruption cases in Indonesia has an influence on the Indonesian Corruption Perception Index. Indonesia only got a score of 34 out of 100, a decrease of 4 points from the previous year which reached a score of 38, Indonesia was also ranked 110th out of 180 surveyed (TII, 2023). Fraud knows no place and can occur in any sector and agency, including entities that have duties and functions in enforcing the law and have fraud prevention mechanisms and systems that are documented in internal regulations and apply to the organization's people as a whole. This research aims to describe the implementation of fraud prevention strategies that currently exist in an entity and evaluate them based on a reference, namely the principles in the second edition of the Fraud Risk Management Guide (FRM Guide) published by COSO in 2023. The reference used is the latest in this research and also the research object, namely the Lembaga XYZ which is a government entity whose function is to carry out the mandate of the law. This research is a case study with an evaluation type, elaborating data analysis from interviews with questionnaires, as well as documentation data such as internal regulations and entity risk management reports. The sampling method was carried out with the author's justification for considering the representative organizational structure, the work unit of the technical organizer, and the characteristics of one unit and another with different functions. The research results show that the principles of Fraud Risk Management have been implemented quite well. However, the entity's fraud prevention strategy is still less effective because there is no specific intention to address the risk of fraud. The entity has not created a specific segregation of duties in managing fraud risk by a work unit and the fraud risk management program is still generally incorporated into the entity's risk management in general.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Plum-X Analityc

References

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report To The Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners

Association of Certified Fraud Examiner Indonesia. (2019). Survey Fraud Indonesia 2019. Association of Certified Fraud Examiner Indonesia

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., Hogan, C. E. (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services. Sixteenth Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Ellet, William. (2018). The Case Study Handbook. A Student’s Guide. Revised Edition. Boston: Harvard Business School.

COSO, ACFE. (2023). Fraud Risk Management Guide. Second Edition. USA

Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Korupsi Tahun 2022. Divisi Hukum dan Monitoring Peradilan ICW.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024). Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Sektor. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-sektor

Muhaemil, Emil. (2021). Implementasi Strategi Anti Fraud pada Perusahaan Multifinance (Studi Kasus Pada PT XYZ Finance). Jakarta : Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia.

Nadiatul, A.H. (2023). Evaluasi Peranan Audit Internal pada Penerapan Strategi Anti Fraud. Owner : Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(4), 3285-3294. doi: 10.33395/owner.v7i4.1657

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (PP) Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah. Jakarta : Kementerian Hukum dan HAM. Lembaran Negara No.127.

Priantara, Diaz. (2013). Fraud Auditing & Investigation. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Pusat Edukasi Antikorupsi. (2023). Tiga Kasus Korupsi dengan Kerugian Negara Terbesar di Indonesia. https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi informasi/Eksplorasi/20231120-tiga-kasus-korupsi-dengan kerugian negara-terbesar-di-indonesia

Saufan. (2023). Strategi Pencegahan Fraud di Lingkungan Pelabuhan Indonesia. Owner : Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 8(1), 2548-7507. doi: 10.33395/owner.v8i1.1940

Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods For Business Students. Eighth Edition. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Transparency International (2023). Corruption Perception Index (CPI) 2022 : Indonesia. www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2022/index/idn

Transparency International (2023). https://ti.or.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-2022-mengalami-penurunan-terburuk-sepanjang-sejarah reformasi/

Wijaya, A.H.F., Yuniar, S.S. (2021). Sistem Manajemen Anti-Penyuapan ISO 37001:2016 dan Pencegahan Praktik Korupsi di Sektor Pelayanan Publik. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(2), 187-208. doi: 10.32697/integritas.v6i2.684

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods. Sixth Edition. Sage.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Sidabutar, H. D. ., & Julian, L. . (2024). Evaluasi Strategi Fraud Prevention Dengan Menggunakan COSO Fraud Risk Management. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 8(4), 3130-3140. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i4.2425