Analisis Faktor-Faktor Konsumen Terhadap Purchase Intention Sepeda Listrik Menggunakan TAM3

Authors

  • Maulia Regita Belananda Universitas Selamat sri Kendal
  • Muhammad Rezki Ian Universitas Selamat sri Kendal
  • Jamal Universitas Selamat sri Kendal

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v9i1.2532

Keywords:

Behavioral Intention, Electric Bicycle, Purchase Intention, TAM3

Abstract

of people's strong purchasing power and the reasonable cost of electric bicycles. Purposive sampling was employed in questionnaire sampling. Because this study has forty indikator items, it requires a sample size of 200 respondents. The TAM3 model, which has 17 variables, is used in the research model. Only three variables—Subjective Norm, work relevance, and Output Quality—are known to be partially significant and to positively impact Perceived Usefulness . Five factors are identified as partially significant determinants of Perceived Ease of Use; three factors are positively correlated: Self-efficacy, Playfulness, and enjoyment; the other two are negatively correlated: Anxiety and Objective Usability. Perceived Usefulness  and Perceived Ease of Use are partially known to have a positive and significant influence on Behavioral Intention. Then it is known that Behavioral Intention has a positive and significant influence on Purchase Intention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Plum-X Analityc

References

Ady Wahyono, Muhammad Arya Wirawan, & Abdul Yusuf. (2024). Analisis Penerimaan Aplikasi Ajaib dengan Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM 3). Economic Reviews Journal, 3(3), 2425–2436. https://doi.org/10.56709/mrj.v3i3.404

Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role Of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntaruness in the Acceptance of Information Technologi. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x

Agung Dwi Nugroho, Akbar, M., Andini, E., & Hidayatulloh4, A. (2020). PENERAPAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL UNTUK MENJELASKAN NIAT PEMBELIAN MELALUI APLIKASI GO-FOOD Agung. Jurnal Magisma, VIII(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35829/magisma.v1i1.62

Agus Surya Adi P, I. P., Satya Kumara, I. N., & Raka Agung, I. G. A. P. (2022). Status Perkembangan Sepeda Listrik Dan Motor Listrik Di Indonesia. Jurnal SPEKTRUM, 8(4), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.24843/SPEKTRUM.2021.v08.i04.p2

Alomary, A., & Woollard, J. (2015). How Is Technology Accepted by Users? A Review of Technology Acceptance Models and Theories. The IRES 17th International Conference, November, 1–4. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/382037/1/110-14486008271-4.pdf

Astria, V., & Basyir, M. (2022). Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness Dan Perceived Ease of Use Terhadap Behavioral Intention Yang Dimediasi Oleh User Satisfaction Pada Nasabah Pengguna Aplikasi Bca Syariah Mobile Di Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Manajemen SINTA, 4(2), 379–390. https://jim.usk.ac.id/EKM/article/view/20211

Belananda, M. R. (2022). PENGARUH SELF ASSESSMENT SYSTEM TERHADAP PENGHINDARAN PAJAK DENGAN RELIGIUSITAS INTRINSIK SEBAGAI PEMODERASI. Journal Economic Insights, 1(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51792/jei.v3i1.110

BPS Kabupaten Batang. (2022). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat Kabupaten Pandeglang.

Chandra, S. J., & Santoso, T. (2022). Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness dan Perceived Ease of Use Terhadap Purchase Intention Masyarakat Dalam Membeli Produk kecantikan Melalui Behavioral Intention to Use pada Aplikasi Socobysociolla. Agora, 10(2), 1–8. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/manajemen-bisnis/article/view/12777

Friska, & Robert Kristaung. (2023). Voluntary Simplicity dan Sustainable Clothing Purchase Intention dengan Environment Concern sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Ekonomi Digital, 2(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.55837/ed.v2i1.60

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). Review of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. In Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal (Vol. 30, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2108813

Ian, M. R., Irawan, M. Z., & Malkhamah, S. (2022). Persepsi pengguna ojek online di masa pandemi Covid-19 dengan metode analisis faktor eksploratori. Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning, 3(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.37253/jcep.v3i1.6218

Ismahani, R., Anurogo, D. W., & Kunci, K. (2022). Indonesian Journal of Conservation Pemodelan AERMOD Untuk Proyeksi Pola Penyebaran Emisi Heat Recovery Steam Generator PT X dan PT Y. Indonesian Journal of Conservation, 11(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijc.v11i2.37953

Jatmikko, T. W., Nyoman Suluh Wijaya, I., Eka Sari, K., & Eka Sari Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, K. (2019). Gangguan Pencemaran Udara & Preferensi Bermukim Masyarakat Kecamatan Manyar Di Sekitar Kawasan Industri. Planning for Urban Region and Environment Journal (PURE), 8(4), 115–124. https://purejournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/pure/article/view/345

Lintong, D. C. . (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Niat Membeli Online Pada Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah Di Manado (Studi Pada Mahasiswa Perguruan Tinggi). JMBI UNSRAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis Dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi)., 5(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.35794/jmbi.v5i3.21708

Nahas, M. L. S., Mitang, B. B., Huda, N., & Manek, A. (2023). Pengaruh Perceived Ease of Use dan Experience shopping terhadap Intention to buy dengan Perceived Usefulness sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.56113/takuana.v2i2.82

Permana, R., Yuliati, E., & Wulandari, P. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Konsumen Terhadap Purchase Intention Kendaraan Listrik di Indonesia. INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen Indonesia, 6(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.31842/jurnalinobis.v6i2.270

Setiawan, H., Purnama, B., & Suroto. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Penerimaan Pengguna terhadap Website pupr.jambiprov.go.id dengan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi (JMS), 3(2), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.33998/jms.2023.3.2.839

Setiyani, L., Effendy, F., & Slamet, A. A. (2021). Using Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM 3) at Selected Private Technical High School: Google Drive Storage in E-Learning. Utamax?: Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 3(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v3i2.6746

Sujatmiko, I. D., Lanang, I. G., & Eka, P. (2022). Implementasi Technology Acceptance Model 3 ( TAM 3 ) terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Aplikasi Investasi dan Trading Saham ( Studi Kasus?: Aplikasi Mobile IPOT ). 03(01), 35–44.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

Belananda, M. R., Ian, M. R., & Jamal, J. (2025). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Konsumen Terhadap Purchase Intention Sepeda Listrik Menggunakan TAM3. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(1), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v9i1.2532