Reframing Deception: Redefining the Fraud Triangle in the Era of Ethical Governance

Authors

  • Yuliani Almalita Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekomomi Trisakti
  • Rudi Setiadi Tjahjono Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekomomi Trisakti

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v10i1.2917

Keywords:

fraud triangle theory, systematic literature review, corporate ethics, fraud detection

Abstract

This study reviews the evolution of the Fraud Triangle Theory (FTT) from 2010 to 2025 and examines how digital transformation and sustainability issues reshape its explanatory relevance. Using the PRISMA 2020 protocol, a Systematic Literature Review was conducted on 26 Scopus-indexed articles. Descriptive, content, and bibliometric analyses were applied to identify publication trends, methodological patterns, and theoretical developments. Results show that 76% of studies used qualitative or mixed methods, while only 24% employed quantitative or data-driven approaches. Research output peaked in 2022 with 12 publications, and the United States, China, and Indonesia accounted for 54% of contributions. Although FTT remains the dominant framework, 31% of studies integrated Agency Theory, Signaling Theory, or Critical Discourse Analysis. Fraud research increasingly addresses digital governance, ESG violations, and greenwashing. These findings position FTT as a dynamic model shaped by ethical, technological, and institutional forces, underscoring the need for hybrid behavior data analytical frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Plum-X Analityc

References

Almalita, Y. (2025). Decoding Financial Fraud: The Impact of Corporate Governance and the Fraud Triangle on F-Score. Global Research Review in Business and Economics, 11(2), 59–66.

Bertucci, A., Skufca, T., & Boyer?Davis, S. (2021). Section 806 of the Sarbanes?Oxley act: Can the fraud triangle prevent fraud in the finance sector? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 32(4), 158–167. doi: 10.1002/jcaf.22520

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement (p. 191). New York, NY, US: Free Press.

Daigle, R. J., Hayes, D. C., & Morris, P. W. (2014). Dr. Phil and Montel help AIS students “Get Real” with the fraud triangle. Journal of Accounting Education, 32(2), 146–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.03.004

Darmawan, R. D., & Almalita, Y. (2025). The Role of Corporate Resposibility, Board Reputation, and Gender in Overcoming Financial distress during Covid-19. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 34(1), 12–21.

Dellaportas, S. (2013). Conversations with inmate accountants: Motivation, opportunity and the fraud triangle. Accounting Forum, 37(1), 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2012.09.003

Free, C. (2015). Looking through the fraud triangle: A review and call for new directions. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(2), 175–196. doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2015-0009

Huang, J., Kombate, B., Li, Y., Kouadio, K. R., & Xie, P. (2023). Effective risk management in the shadow of COVID-19 pandemic: The evidence of Indonesian listed corporations. Heliyon, 9(5). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15744

Huang, S. Y., Lin, C.-C., Chiu, A.-A., & Yen, D. C. (2017). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(6), 1343–1356. doi: 10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9

Kurpierz, J. R., & Smith, K. (2020). The greenwashing triangle: Adapting tools from fraud to improve CSR reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(6), 1075–1093. doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2018-0272

Lasda Bergman, E. M. (2012). Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6), 370–379. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002

Lokanan, M. E. (2015). Challenges to the fraud triangle: Questions on its usefulness. Accounting Forum, 39(3), 201–224. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2015.05.002

Lootah, M., Gleason, K., Smith, D., & Zoubi, T. (2025). Fraud risk of sovereign wealth funds: Fraud triangle and agency theory perspectives. Journal of Financial Crime, 32(3), 515–529. doi: 10.1108/JFC-05-2024-0155

Narsa, N. P. D. R. H., Afifa, L. M. E., & Wardhaningrum, O. A. (2023). Fraud triangle and earnings management based on the modified M-score: A study on manufacturing company in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(2), e13649. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13649

Owusu, G. M. Y., Koomson, T. A. A., Alipoe, S. A., & Kani, Y. A. (2022). Examining the predictors of fraud in state-owned enterprises: An application of the fraud triangle theory. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(2), 427–444. doi: 10.1108/JMLC-05-2021-0053

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

Rahman, M. J., & Jie, X. (2024). Fraud detection using fraud triangle theory: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(1), 101–118. doi: 10.1108/JFC-09-2022-0219

Rustiarini, N. W., Sutrisno, S., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Fraud triangle in public procurement: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4), 951–968. doi: 10.1108/JFC-11-2018-0121

Said, J., Alam, Md. M., Karim, Z. A., & Johari, R. J. (2018). Integrating religiosity into fraud triangle theory: Findings on Malaysian police officers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(2), 111–123. doi: 10.1108/JCRPP-09-2017-0027

Sánchez-Aguayo, M., Urquiza-Aguiar, L., & Estrada-Jiménez, J. (2022). Predictive Fraud Analysis Applying the Fraud Triangle Theory through Data Mining Techniques. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3382. doi: 10.3390/app12073382

Schuchter, A., & Levi, M. (2015). Beyond the fraud triangle: Swiss and Austrian elite fraudsters. Accounting Forum, 39(3), 176–187. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2014.12.001

Simbolon, R. (2025). The presence of female legislators: Fraud triangle elements and fraud. Journal of Financial Crime, 32(4), 804–824. doi: 10.1108/JFC-06-2024-0183

Vicky Herviana, Arum Ardianingsih, & Rika Adriyana. (2022). Determinan Pengaruh Kecenderungan Fraud Dalam Penyaluran Dana Bantuan Sosial Covid-19. AKUA: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1(3), 322–332. doi: 10.54259/akua.v1i3.993

Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587–600. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0

Wang, J., Chen, Y., & Wang, S. (2024). Exploring the relationship between corporate ESG performance and corporate violation: Based on the fraud triangle theory. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 5606–5626. doi: 10.1002/csr.2882

Zhu, C., Zeng, R., Wang, R., & Xiao, Y. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and chief executive officer wrongdoing: A fraud triangle perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 874–888. doi: 10.1002/csr.2394

Downloads

Published

2026-01-06

How to Cite

Almalita, Y. ., & Tjahjono, R. S. . (2026). Reframing Deception: Redefining the Fraud Triangle in the Era of Ethical Governance. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(1), 527-545. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v10i1.2917