Evaluasi Penerapan Risk-Based Audit untuk Mendeteksi Ketidakpatuhan Akuntan Publik terhadap Standar Profesi dan Regulasi

Authors

  • Diky Mahendra Universitas Indonesia
  • Agung Nugroho Soedibyo Magister Akuntansi, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v7i2.1387

Keywords:

public accountants supervision, risk-based audit selection, risk profiles, PPPK

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing risk-based audit selection (RBAS) in conducting supervision of Public Accountants (CPAs) and Public Accounting Firms in Indonesia. The research object in this study is Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan (PPPK) as an authorized regulator to provide coaching and supervision of the public accounting profession. This research is motivated by the policy of redesigning the function of coaching and supervising the finance professions. One approach focuses on preparing CPAs and Public Accounting Firms risk profiles, which then become the basis for determining risk-based supervision patterns. In addition, there is an imbalance between the number of AP supervised and the number of resources owned by the regulator, so an effective supervision strategy is required through the RBAS approach. The research method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative method through semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and literature study. The results showed that in general the risk-based supervision function in PPPK was quite effective and was in line with applicable guidelines and regulations. However, in the implementation process there are still issues related to the variables used to calculate the CPAs risk level, where qualitative information is an important factor in determining the selected inspection object.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Plum-X Analityc

References

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Tahun 2020.

Gemeda, T., & Kassu, T. (2020). Risk Based Tax Audit Practices in Ethiopia, Evidence from Western Addis Ababa Small Taxpayers Branch Office. European Journal of Business and Management, 12(28), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/12-28-06

Gupta, M., & Nagadevara, V. (2007). Audit Selection Strategy for Improving Tax Compliance: Application of Data Mining Technique. 378–387.

Hariyani, D. (2018). Evaluasi atas Efektivitas Pengawasan Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan Terhadap Akuntan Publik Dan Kantor Akuntan Publik. Universitas Indonesia.

Hayes, R., Philip, W., & Hans, G. (2014). Principles of Auditing. An Introduction to International Standards of Auditing (Third Edit). Harlow: Prentice Hall.

International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2011). IFAC Policy Position 1 - Regulation of The Accountancy Profession.

Ittonen, K. (2010). A Theoretical Examination of the Role of Auditing and the Relevance of Audit Reports. Vaasan yliopisto.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 154/PMK.01/2017 Tahun 2017 tentang Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Akuntan Publik.

___. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 186 Tahun 2021 tentang Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Akuntan Publik.

Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2017). Auditing & Assurance Services: A systematic Approach (Tenth Edit). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Fourth Edi). Sage publications.

Owolabi, S. A., & Olagunju, A. O. (2020). Historical Evolution of Audit Theory and Practice. EVOLUTION, 16(1).

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011 tentang Akuntan Publik.

___. (2015). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2015 tentang Praktik Akuntan Publik.

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2012). Guideline to PCAOB Inspection. The Center for Audit Quality (CAQ).

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan. (2019). Keputusan Kepala Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan Nomor: KEP-17/PPPK/2019 tanggal 30 September 2019 tentang Pedoman Pemeriksaan terhadap Akuntan Publik, KAP dan/atau Cabang KAP.

___. (2021). Keputusan Kepala Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan Nomor: KEP-34/PPPK/2021 tanggal 30 Desember 2021 tentang Pedoman Pemeriksaan terhadap Akuntan Publik, KAP dan/atau Cabang KAP.

___. (2021). Laporan Penyelesaian Pekerjaan – Penyusunan Profil Risiko Profesi Akuntan Publik.

___. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Akuntan Publik Tahun 2020. Jakarta.

___. (2022). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan AP dan KAP Tahun 2021 – 2022.

___. (2022). Rekap Data Sanksi Administratif AP dan KAP Tahun 2018 – 2021.

Sugiyono, P. D. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. ALFABETA.

Van Asseldonk, M., & Velthuis, A. G. J. (2014). Risk-Based Audit Selection of Dairy Farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(2), 592–597.

Zacchea, N. M. (2003). Risk-Based Audit Target Selection can Increase the Probability of Conducting Value-Added Audits. Journal of Government Financial Management, 52, 22–28.

Published

2023-01-17

How to Cite

Mahendra, D. ., & Soedibyo, A. N. . (2023). Evaluasi Penerapan Risk-Based Audit untuk Mendeteksi Ketidakpatuhan Akuntan Publik terhadap Standar Profesi dan Regulasi. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1387