Pengaruh Green Business dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan: Corporate Social Responsibility sebagai Pemoderasi

Authors

  • Andi Aris Mattunruang
    ✉ Corresponding author: arismattunruang11@gmail.com
    Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Patompo, Indonesia
  • Asmirawati Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Patompo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1948

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility; Financial Performance; Good Corporate Governance; Green Business;

Abstract

The aim of this study was conducted to find out whether green business using the annual reports of companies that received the Pollution Control, Evaluation and Ranking Program Award (PROPER) corporate social responsibility is influenced by the characteristics of the board of commissioners (number of independent commissioners, diversity of the board of commissioners, and concentration of ownership) and whether financial performance (ROA, ROE and Tobin's Q) is moderated by corporate social responsibility, in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2015 to 2022. The population used is all companies listed on the Stock Exchange Indonesia for five consecutive years. The sampling method was selected using purposive sampling, namely non-financial companies included in Pefindo 25. This study used a quantitative approach. The samples used in this study were 22 companies with 110 observations. The data analysis method uses panel data regression (Eviews 9) with Descriptive Statistical Tests, Model Conformity Tests, namely the Chow test and Hausman test, followed by the F test, the Goodness of Fit test, the hypothesis test, and finally the t test. The results of research on green economy and good corporate governance which are proxied by the number of independent commissioners, the diversity of the board of commissioners and the majority ownership of the company have a positive effect on financial performance. moderated by corporate social responsibility has no positive effect on financial performance proxied by ROA, ROE and leverage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AlNuaimi, B. K., Al Mazrouei, M., & Jabeen, F. (2020). Enablers of green business process management in the oil and gas sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(8), 1671-1694.

Ang, R., Shao, Z., Liu, C., Yang, C., & Zheng, Q. (2022). The relationship between CSR and financial performance and the moderating effect of ownership structure: Evidence from Chinese heavily polluting listed enterprises. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 117-129.

Bai, X., Wang, K. T., Tran, T. K., Sadiq, M., Trung, L. M., & Khudoykulov, K. (2022). Measuring China’s green economic recovery and energy environment sustainability: econometric analysis of sustainable development goals. Economic Analysis and Policy, 75, 768-779.

Blumberg, B., Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2014). EBOOK: Business research methods. McGraw Hill.

Bose, S., Khan, H. Z., Rashid, A., & Islam, S. (2018). What drives green banking disclosure? An institutional and corporate governance perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35, 501-527.

Chouaibi, J., Belhouchet, S., Almallah, R., & Chouaibi, Y. (2022). Do board directors and good corporate governance improve integrated reporting quality? The moderating effect of CSR: an empirical analysis. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(4), 593-618.

Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of financial economics, 131(3), 693-714.

Ernayanti, N. P. (2022). Kemampuan Corporate Social Responsibility Memoderasi Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar).

Endo, K. (2020). Corporate governance beyond the shareholder–stakeholder dichotomy: Lessons from Japanese corporations' environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1625-1633.

Endrikat, J., De Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., & Guenther, E. M. (2021). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic investigation. Business & Society, 60(8), 2099-2135.

Fallah, M. R., & Soori, M. (2023). Presenting a framework for the successful entry of women entrepreneurs into green entrepreneurship. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(3), 467-486.

Hai Yen, T. T., Wong, W. K., Al-Abyadh, M. H. A., Muda, I., Julca-Guerrero, F., Hishan, S. S., & Islam, M. M. (2023). The impact of ecological innovation and corporate social responsibilities on the sustainable development: Moderating role of environmental ethics. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3), 2153260.

He, Y., & Liu, R. (2023). The impact of the level of green finance development on corporate debt financing capacity. Finance Research Letters, 52, 103552.

Hediono, B. P., & Prasetyaningsih, I. (2019). Pengaruh Implementasi Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 14(1), 47-58.

Huang, C., & Mirza, S. S. (2023). Green business practices and corporate financialization: Role of female directors in Chinese small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 34(1), 137-151.

Huang, J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of the turnover of local officials. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102497.

Issa, A. (2023). Shaping a sustainable future: The impact of board gender diversity on clean energy use and the moderating role of environmental, social and governance controversies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

Kasayanond, A., Umam, R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Environmental sustainability and its growth in Malaysia by elaborating the green economy and environmental efficiency. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(5), 465-473.

Kweeswara, C. O., & Irawan, J. F. P. (2023). Green Banking, Kesehatan Bank dan Profitabilitas dengan Corporate Social Responsibility sebagai Variabel Moderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(4), 968-983.

Latif, B., Ong, T. S., Meero, A., Abdul Rahman, A. A., & Ali, M. (2022). Employee-perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) and employee pro-environmental behavior (PEB): The moderating role of CSR skepticism and CSR authenticity. Sustainability, 14(3), 1380.

Li, J., Fu, T., Han, S., & Liang, R. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Media Attention. Sustainability, 15(6), 5023.

Lin, B., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Measuring the green economic growth in China: Influencing factors and policy perspectives. Energy, 241, 122518.

Magid, A. A., Hussainey, K., De Andrés, J., & Lorca, P. (2023). The moderating role of online social media in the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and investment decisions: evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(2), 60.

Perboli, G., & Rosano, M. (2019). Parcel delivery in urban areas: Opportunities and threats for the mix of traditional and green business models. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 99, 19-36.

Praningrum, A. K. (2016). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan terlisting Bursa Efek Indonesia yang Termasuk dalam Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI) tahun 2011-tahun 2013). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 4(2).

Rahman, S. U., & Nguyen?Viet, B. (2023). Towards sustainable development: Coupling green marketing strategies and consumer perceptions in addressing greenwashing. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2420-2433.

Rakhimova, K. (2022). Socio-economic necessity of increasing the importance of green business. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, 3(4), 1034-1037.

Rizal, M. Y. Z., Nurdin, N., & Azib, A. (2019). Pengaruh Implementasi Green Company terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan.

Ruan, R., Chen, W., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Linking Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility with Green Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Shared Vision Capability and the Moderating Role of Resource Slack. Sustainability, 14(24), 16943.

Sarwar, S. (2022). Impact of energy intensity, green economy and blue economy to achieve sustainable economic growth in GCC countries: Does Saudi Vision 2030 matters to GCC countries. Renewable energy, 191, 30-46.

Suteja, J., Gunardi, A., Alghifari, E. S., Susiadi, A. A., Yulianti, A. S., & Lestari, A. (2023). Investment decision and firm value: moderating effects of corporate social responsibility and profitability of non-financial sector companies on the Indonesia stock exchange. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(1), 40.

Wang, L., Ur Rehman, A., Xu, Z., Amjad, F., & Ur Rehman, S. (2023). Green Corporate Governance, Green Finance, and Sustainable Performance Nexus in Chinese SMES: A Mediation Moderation Model. Sustainability, 15(13), 9914.

Wiska, S. A. M., Putra, I. G. C., & Merawati, L. K. (2018). Kemampuan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Memoderasi Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance (GCG) dan Profitabilitas pada Nilai Perusahaan. Juara: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 8(1).

Xu, J., Yu, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, J. Z., Liu, Y., Cao, Y., & Eachempati, P. (2022). Green supply chain management for operational performance: anteceding impact of corporate social responsibility and moderating effects of relational capital. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(6), 1613-1638.

Zahoor, N., Lew, Y. K., Arslan, A., Christofi, M., & Tarba, S. Y. (2023). International corporate social responsibility and post-entry performance of developing market INVs: The moderating role of corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of International Management, 101036.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-01

How to Cite

Mattunruang, A. A., & Asmirawati, A. (2023). Pengaruh Green Business dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan: Corporate Social Responsibility sebagai Pemoderasi. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(4), 3672-3680. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1948