Implikasi Adopsi IFRS Sustainability Standards terhadap Peningkatan Non-Audit Fees dan Independensi Auditor: Studi Kualitatif pada KAP di Indonesia

Authors

  • Ary Haritsaning Atmadya
    ✉ Corresponding author: aryhatmadya@gmail.com
    Universitas Airlangga
  • Dirgahayu Almi Mahati Universitas Airlangga
  • Anak Agung Gde Satia Utama Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v10i2.3050

Abstract

The issuance of IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) has fundamentally transformed the landscape of sustainability reporting, shifting it from a voluntary regime toward a framework integrated with general-purpose financial reporting. This transformation has driven a surge in demand for sustainability-related services, including IFRS S1/S2 implementation consulting and sustainability assurance, which are largely classified as non-audit services and have the potential to increase sustainability-related non-audit fees within the revenue structure of Public Accounting Firms (PAFs). This study adopts an interpretive qualitative approach based on literature review and document analysis (including standards, codes of ethics, research reports, and scholarly articles) to identify and categorize auditor independence threats—namely self-interest, self-review, advocacy, familiarity, and management participation—arising from the expansion of sustainability services following IFRS S1/S2. The findings indicate that the joint provision of IFRS S1/S2 consulting and assurance services by the same audit firm may strengthen economic dependence, create self-review and advocacy threats, and blur the boundary between the roles of consultant and independent auditor. On the other hand, the profession and regulators have begun to respond by strengthening safeguards, such as restricting the types of services provided, implementing fee caps, separating advisory and assurance teams, and reinforcing ethical frameworks for sustainability assurance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Plum-X Analityc

References

(International Organization of Securities Commissions [IOSCO]. (2023). Annual Report. IOSCO. https://www.iosco.org/annual_reports/2023/pdf/annualReport2023.pdf

Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board. (2025). APES 110 prohibitions applicable to audit, review and sustainability assurance engagements. https://apesb.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/APES_110_Prohibitions_2025.pdf

Amir, E., Guan, Y., & Livne, G. (2019). Abnormal fees and timely loss recognitionâ€â€A long-term perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(3), 1–22.

Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.611

Australian Institute of Company Directors. (2024). Submission to the AUASB on proposed Australian Standard on Sustainability Assurance ASSA 5010 (Timeline for audits and reviews of information in sustainability reports under the Corporations Act 2001). https://www.auasb.gov.au/media/ln2da0zk/sub24-assa5010_aicd.pdf

Australian Securities and Investments Commission. (2025). FAQs: Review or audit of sustainability reports. https://www.asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/sustainability-reporting/faqs-review-or-audit-of-sustainability-reports/

Basioudis, I. G., Papakonstantinou, E., & Geiger, M. A. (2008). Audit fees, non?audit fees and auditor going?concern reporting decisions in the United Kingdom. Abacus, 44(3), 284–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00263.x

Cho, M., Kwon, S. Y., & Krishnan, G. V. (2021). Audit fee lowballing: Determinants, recovery, and future audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(4), 106787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106787

DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non–audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00088

Dumble, K., Li, A., & Keys, R. (2021). Review of auditor remuneration disclosure requirements (AASB Research Report No. 15). Australian Accounting Standards Board. https://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/RR15_AuditorDisclosureRequirements_02-21.pdf

Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 71–105. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.71

Geiger, M. A., Basioudis, I. G., & DeLange, P. (2022). The effect of non-audit fees and industry specialization on the prevalence and accuracy of auditors’ going-concern reporting decisions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 47, 100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100473

HLB Mann Judd. (2025). Sustainability reporting & assurance. https://hlb.com.au/services/audit-assurance/sustainability-reporting-assurance/

IFRS Foundation. (2023a). IFRS S1: General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. International Sustainability Standards Board. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements-for-disclosure-of-sustainability-related-financial-information/

IFRS Foundation. (2023b). IFRS S2: Climate-related disclosures. International Sustainability Standards Board. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/

IFRS Foundation. (2023c). Introduction to the ISSB and IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. IFRS Foundation. https://www.ifrs.org/sustainability/knowledge-hub/introduction-to-issb-and-ifrs-sustainability-disclosure-standards/

International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants. (2024). Handbook of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards). International Federation of Accountants. https://www.ethicsboard.org/publications/2024-handbook-international-code-ethics-professional-accountants

International Federation of Accountants, AICPA, & C. (2025). The state of play: Sustainability disclosure and assuranceâ€â€Five-year trends and analysis (2019–2023). https://www.ifac.org/news-events/2025-05/more-global-companies-seek-assurance-sustainability-reporting-study-ifac-aicpa-cima-shows

Kinney, W. R., Palmrose, Z.-V., & Scholz, S. (2004). Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 561–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x

KPMG. (2025). ESG assurance: Helping organizations build trust in sustainability information. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/what-we-do/services/ESG/esg-assurance.html

Liu, Z., Jubb, C., & Abhayawansa, S. (2025). Choice of financial audit firm and ESG assurance firm: The role of board of director characteristics. The British Accounting Review, 57(4), 101505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101505

Meuwissen, R., & Quick, R. (2019). The effects of non-audit services on auditor independence: An experimental investigation of supervisory board members’ perceptions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 36, 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.05.004

PwC. (2025). IESBA’s approved standard: International Ethics Standards for Sustainability Assurance (including International Independence Standards) and other revisions to the IESBA Code relating to sustainability assurance and reporting. PwC Viewpoint. https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/gx/en/pwc/auditing_in_briefs/ext/external-users/iesba-s-approved-standard.html

Quick, R., & Warming-Rasmussen, B. (2015). An experimental analysis of the effects of non-audit services on auditor independence in appearance in the European Union: Evidence from Germany. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 26(2), 150–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12026

Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2020). Empirical analysis of the effect of the joint provision of audit and sustainability assurance services on assurance quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121943

Severn Trent Plc. (2020). Policy for the provision of non-audit services by the external auditors. https://www.severntrent.com/content/dam/stw-plc/about-us-02/Policy_on-provision-of-non-audit-services.pdf

Wardemark, I. (2024). Sustainability reporting and auditing double materiality assessments (DMA). Wolters Kluwer. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/sustainability-reporting-auditing-double-materiality-assessments-dma

Wilson, N. (2024). Sustainability reporting raises auditor independence red flags. Accounting Times. https://www.accountingtimes.com.au/profession/sustainability-reporting-raises-auditor-independence-red-flags

Yakubu, R., & Williams, T. (2020). A theoretical approach to auditor independence and audit quality. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art11

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Atmadya, A. H. ., Mahati, D. A. ., & Utama, A. A. G. S. . (2026). Implikasi Adopsi IFRS Sustainability Standards terhadap Peningkatan Non-Audit Fees dan Independensi Auditor: Studi Kualitatif pada KAP di Indonesia . Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(2), 1233-1247. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v10i2.3050