Going Concern Matter Disclosure: Evidence from Abnormal Cash Flow, Value Creation, Litigation, and Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v10i3.3313Abstract
Going Concern represents a fundamental assumption underlying the preparation of financial statements, and is a key focus in the audit process, especially with the existence of SA 570 Revision 2021, which requires the disclosure of material uncertainty through going concern matter disclosure (GCMD). This study investigates the influence of abnormal operating cash flow, value creation, litigation, and audit committee on GCMD in the audit reports of consumer cyclicals companies. The research population includes all consumer cyclicals companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2022–2024. Purposive sampling was used to obtain 71 companies with a total of 213 observations as the research analysis units. A quantitative approach with causal research design was applied. Secondary data were obtained from annual reports and independent auditor reports published on the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the effect of each independent variable on the probability of GCMD disclosure. The findings reveal that litigation risk and value creation have a positive and significant effect on GCMD disclosure, whereas the audit committee shows a significant negative relationship. In contrast, abnormal operating cash flow does not significantly influence GCMD. These results suggest that auditors place greater emphasis on legal risk exposure, governance effectiveness, and uncertainty surrounding future value generation rather than relying solely on operational cash flow indicators when assessing business continuity.
Downloads
References
Alqatamin, D. A., & Alqatamin, R. M. (2024). Audit committee characteristics and financial reporting quality: Evidence from the emerging market. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 14(3), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv14i3p9
Amami, I., & Triani, N. N. A. (2021). Pengaruh audit delay, fee audit, leverage, litigasi, ukuran dan umur perusahaan terhadap opini audit going concern. AKUNESA: Jurnal Akuntansi Unesa, 10(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.26740/akunesa.v10n1.p46-56
Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2024). Potensi delisting perusahaan tercatat. http://www.idx.co.id
Dancakova, D., & Glova, J. (2024). The impact of value-added intellectual capital on corporate performance: Cross-sector evidence. Risks, 12, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12100151
Dewa, M. J., Ardini, L., & H, S. B. (2025). Financial distress and abnormal operating cash flows: Firm-size moderation of auditor going-concern opinions. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 35(6), 1542–1556. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i06.p03
Felicia, W., & Lindrianasari. (2025). Determinants influencing companies receiving going concern opinions: Empirical evidence from a developing market. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutional, 15(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv15i1sip2
Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 26. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hidayah, E., & Rachmadiyana. (2024). Going concern audit opinion: Analysis of financial performance, corporate governance, and company size. Proceedings of the International Conference on Accounting and Finance (InCAF), 2, 606–619.
Hidayat, A. H., & Setiyawati, H. (2022). Impact of Pandemic Financial Crisis to the Going Concern Audit Opinion Factors. Advances in Social Sciiences Research Journal (ASSRJ), 9(5), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.95.11973.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021). Standar Audit 570: Kelangsungan usaha.
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales (ICAEW). (2005). Agency theory and the role of audit. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
Iswajuni, Adiwijaya, C. C., & Habiburrochman. (2023). Pengaruh real activity manipulation terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Journal of Accounting, Taxation, and Finance (JATF), 2(2), 164–183.
Jannah, M., Ariani, N. E., A, N. A. N., & Lautania, M. F. (2025). Insights into going concern matter disclosure in the audit report. Journal of Accounting Research Organization and Economics, 8(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v8i1.36566
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kurniawan, Y. D., Hartono, H. R. P., Abdullah, L. O., & Amrulloh, A. (2021). Pengaruh Leverage, Profitabilitas, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Dewan Komisaris Independen dan Komite Audit terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Al-Masraf: Jurnal Lembaga Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 6(1), 82–94.
Nurbaiti, A., & Vania, E. D. (2023). Analysis of the influence of sustainability reporting, auditor switching, and good corporate governance on going concern audit opinion. JIST: Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 4(11), 1895–1904. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v4i11.782
Nurkhasanah, N. A., & Soepriyanto, G. (2023). Industry accounting index and going concern audit opinion pre and during Covid-19: Empirical evidence from listed companies in Indonesia. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 16(1), 1403–1418. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-0070103
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2015). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 55/POJK.04/2015 tentang pembentukan dan pedoman pelaksanaan kerja komite audit.
Prastyawati, T., Anshari, R., & Pribadi, M. I. (2025). Peran frekuensi rapat komite audit dan independensi komite dalam meningkatkan kualitas pelaporan keuangan di sektor infrastruktur. Media Mahardhika, 24(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.29062/mahardika.v24i1.1382
Pulic, A. (2000). VAICTM – an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5–8), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2000.002891
Riahi-belkaoui, A. (2003). Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms A study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930310472839
Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dela Ameliasari, Nanik Sri Utaminingsih

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







