Penyesuaian Lapisan dan Tarif PPh Orang Pribadi: Agresif atau Progresif?

Authors

  • Kalyana Mitta Kristanti Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i1.600

Keywords:

Equity, Democracy, Personal Income Tax, Tax Harmonization Law

Abstract

In 2022, Indonesia would apply changes in tax brackets and rates for personal income tax. This adjustment is based on the Article 17 Paragraph 1 Tax Harmonization Law Number 7 of 2021. The government tries to accommodate the needs of the community through formulating process of this regulation. In particular, it provides convenience to the lower-middle income community and encourages an even distribution of income. People belonging to the high wealth income will be subject to the highest tariffs that have just been set through this law. Through a qualitative descriptive method in which data collection is carried out by taking from literature review; law, articles, books, and website, the author tries to analyze changes in brackets and rates of personal income tax. This study presents illustrations of the calculation to explain the difference in the amount of income tax payable before and after the implementation of the Tax Harmonization Law. In addition, the analysis of the principles of equity and democracy on the adjustment of layers and tax rates is elaborated in this paper. The results obtained explain that with the application of the new tax rate, taxpayers get a tax burden relief because the tax expense is lower due to the broadening of income range. However, wealthy taxpayers will pay more taxes because of the higher tax rates. This condition proves that the new tax rate supports vertical fairness in the taxation system. In addition, the implementation of regulations related to tax rates adjustment provides evidence that the implementation of democracy has been implemented. The adjustment of tax brackets and rates has a positive impact on the community and the government so that the allocation of tax revenues can run optimally to support the welfare of the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amir, H., Asafu-Adjaye, J., & Ducpham, T. (2013). The Impact of the Indonesian income tax reform: A CGE analysis. Economic Modelling, 31(1), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.12.018

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Edition). SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.

Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran. (2021). Peran Pajak Sebagai Stimulus Ekonomi di Masa Pandemi. Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran. https://anggaran.kemenkeu.go.id/api/Medias/1693aa3f-38e3-4dff-80d0-247e5e273cd9

Farman, G., Khairani, D., & Mukarromah, A. (2015). Memburu Pajak dari High Wealth Individual (HWI). InsideTax, 5–14.

Figari, F., & Verbist, G. (2014). The Redistributive Effect and Progressivity of Taxes Revisited: An International Comparison across the European Union. FinanzArchiv, 70(3), 405. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522114x684529

Gerber, C., Klemm, A., Liu, L., & Mylonas, V. (2018). Personal Income Tax Progressivity: Trends and Implications. International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3314577

Heer, B., & Süssmuth, B. (2013). Tax Bracket Creep and Its Effects on Income Distribution. Journal of Macroeconomics, 38, 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.08.015

Hyman, D. N. (2011). Public Finance: A Contemporary Application of Theory to Policy (10th Edition). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Kelsen, H. (2016). Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara. Nusamedia.

Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2021). Naskah Akademik RUU KUP 2021.

Mardiasmo. (2018). Perpajakan (Yeskha & Ratih, Eds.). CV Andi Offset.

Martimort, D. (2001). Optimal Taxation and Strategic Budget Deficit Under Political Regime Switching. Review of Economic Studies, 68(3), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00181

Masdi, A. (2021). Menakar Penerimaan Pajak di Tahun Pandemi. Kementerian Keuangan RI. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/artikel-dan-opini/menakar-penerimaan-pajak-di-tahun-pandemi/

Morini, M., & Pellegrino, S. (2018). Personal income tax reforms: A genetic algorithm approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(3), 994–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.059

Nazir, M. (1988). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.

Nguyen, H. P., & Khieu, H. (2021). Progressive Wealth Tax: An Inquiry into Biden’s Tax Policy. Economic Analysis and Policy, 72, 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.10.011

OECD. (2021). Revenue Statistics 2021 Initial Impact of COVID-19 on OECD Tax Revenues.

Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Keempat atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 tentang Pajak Penghasilan.

Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia 101/PMK.010/2016 tentang Penyesuaian Besarnya Penghasilan Tidak Kena Pajak.

Republik Indonesia. (2021). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan.

Rosdiana, H., & Irianto, E. S. (2012). Kebijakan dan Implementasi di Indonesia. Rajawali Press.

Sarte, P.-D. G. (1997). Progressive Taxation and Income Inequality in Dynamic Competitive Equilibrium. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00026-1

Shorrocks, A., Davies, J., & Lluberas, R. (2021). Global Wealth Report 2021.

Suandy, E. (2016). Hukum Pajak. Salemba Empat.

Trihusodo, P. (2021). Masih Lebih Rendah Dibanding Tarif Tetangga. Portal Informasi Indonesia. https://www.indonesia.go.id/kategori/indonesia-dalam-angka/3311/masih-lebih-rendah-dibanding-tarif-tetangga

Vissaro, D. (2021). Ini Alasan Perlunya Tambahan Tax Bracket PPh Orang Pribadi. DDTCNews. https://news.ddtc.co.id/ini-alasan-perlunya-tambahan-tax-bracket-pph-orang-pribadi-31070

Downloads

Published

2022-01-10

How to Cite

Kristanti, K. M. (2022). Penyesuaian Lapisan dan Tarif PPh Orang Pribadi: Agresif atau Progresif?. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(1), 709-721. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i1.600