EVALUASI PENYELESAIAN TINDAK LANJUT REKOMENDASI HASIL AUDIT BPK SEBAGAI KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Siti Kurniati; Yulianti Abbas

doi:10.33395/owner.v7i4.1632

Authors

Siti Kurniati Universitas Indonesia
Yulianti Abbas Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v7i4.1632

Keywords:

Evaluation, Follow Up on Audit Findings, Institusional Isomorphism, Key Performance Indicator, Public Organizations, SMART criteria

Abstract

Using SMART criteria and Institutional Isomorphism perspective, this study intends to evaluate the Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia (BPK)’s audit recommendation follow-up at the Directorate General Z. Although the audit recommendation follow-up has been Directorate General Z’s Key Performance Indicator (KPI) since 2018, it still fails to complete all recommendations within the last five years. This study intends to identify factors causing the non-optimal completion of the follow-up of BPK's audit as the institution’s KPI. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study as well as content analysis and Miles and Huberman's model for analyzing the interview results. The results show that the KPI related to the follow-up on BPK recommendations have not fully met the SMART criteria, namely (1) Measurable; and (2) Achievable/Attainable criteria. Thus, this study suggests an adjustment to KPI is needed to ensure a full completion of audit recommendation follow up. Additionally, institution needs to account for factors that may influence KPI adjustment, namely the involvement of external parties, employee performance incentives, innovation, and society’s expectations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Akbar, R., Pilcher, R. A., & Perrin, B. (2015). Implementing performance measurement systems: Indonesian local government under pressure. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 12(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0013

Alijoyo, A., Wijaya, Q. B., & Jacob, I. (2020). Structured or Semi-structured Interviews. CRMS Indonesia, 1–15. www.lspmks.-

ANAO. (2011). Development and Implementation of Key Performance Indicators to Support the Outcomes and Programs Framework.

Andriana, N. (2019). Analysis of Factors Cause to Non-Optimal Management of Follow-up Audit Findings Case Study on Finance Education and Training Agency, Ministry of Finance. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 10(18). https://doi.org/10.7176/RJFA

Bjerke, M. B., & Renger, R. (2017). Being smart about writing SMART objectives. Evaluation and Program Planning, 61, 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.009

BPK RI. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2022 https://www.bpk.go.id/ihps

BPK RI (September 2019). Tindak lanjut rekomendasi BPK harus bermanfaat. Warta Pemeriksa Edisi 9 Vol IV, 4-6.

BPK RI. (September 14, 2018). Pentingnya tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK https://www.bpk.go.id/news/pentingnya-tindak-lanjut-rekomendasi-hasil-pemeriksaan-bpk

BPK RI. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I tahun 2008. (n.d.) Juli, 18 2022. https://ntt.bpk.go.id/tindak-lanjut-hasil-pemeriksaan-2/

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

Hartono, T. (2006). Evaluasi Penyelesaian Tindak Lanjut Temuan Audit Manajemen Kantor Cabang. Universitas Diponegoro.

Ishak, Z., Fong, S. L., & Shin, S. C. (2019). SMART KPI management system framework. 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology, ICSET 2019 - Proceeding, 6, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEngT.2019.8906478

Ismaryanto, W. S. (2011). Evaluasi Indikator Kinerja Utama pada KPP Pratama Semarang Barat.

Kurniawan, D., & Akbar, R. (2021). The Evaluation of Performance Indicators Development: A Study on Indonesian Financial Transaction Report and Analysis Center (PPATK). Journal of Accounting and Investment, 22(3), 426–459. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v22i3.11157

Lusiana, L., Djamhuri, A., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2017). Analisis Penyelesaian Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan. Jurnal Economia, 13(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v13i2.15180

Parmenter, D. (2020). Key Performance Indicators Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs (Fourth). Wiley.

Pratiwi, I., & Akbar, R. (2018). Komitmen Afektif Manajemen, Implementasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja, Akuntabilitas, dan Kinerja Organisasi Publik dalam Perspektif Teori Institusional dan Teori Strukturasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 11(1), 1–10.

Prayudi, M. A., & Basuki, H. (2014). Hubungan Aspek Power, Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Administratif, Akuntabilitas, Dan Efisiensi Program Jaminan Kesehatan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 11(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2014.04

Primarisanti, H., & Akbar, R. (2015). Factors Influencing the Success of Performance Measurement: Evidence From Local Government. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 30(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.7334

Selvik, J. T., Stanley, I., & Abrahamsen, E. B. (2020). SMART criteria for quality assessment of key performance indicators used in the oil and gas industry. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 16(7), 999–1007. https://doi.org/10.23940/ijpe.20.07.p2.9991007

Shahin, A., & Mahbod, M. A. (2007). Prioritization of key performance indicators: An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400710731437

Sofyani, H., & Akbar, R. (2013). Hubungan Faktor Internal Institusi Dan Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Sakip) Di Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 10(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2013.10

Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004