Evaluasi Implementasi Pengawasan Berbasis Kewilayahan: Studi Kasus KPP Pratama X

Muhammad Ridho  Satyanugraha; Yulianti Abbas

doi:10.33395/owner.v8i2.2074

Authors

Muhammad Ridho Satyanugraha Universitas Indonesia
Yulianti Abbas Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v8i2.2074

Keywords:

Account Representative; Regional-Based Supervision; Supporting Factors; Tax

Abstract

Regional-based supervision is a new policy implemented by the Directorate General of Taxes in 2020 and revised in 2022. This study aims to evaluate factors related to the implementation of regional-based supervision, which are top management support, regulations, regional account representatives, taxpayers, and information systems. The factors are further divided into thirteen indicators. Previous studies on regional-based supervision and/or tax supervision in general mostly focused on the influence of tax supervision activities on taxpayer compliance or tax revenues. This study differs from previous study because it seeks an in-depth understanding of the implementation of supporting factors in regional-based supervision via an in-depth case study. The interviews involved the office head, the supervision section head, regional account representative, tax consultant, and taxpayers. The results of the study indicate a weakness in the implementation of regional-based supervision related to regulation, both in terms of the availability of regulation that regulate interactions among the parties involved and the clarity in the field of taxation. Additionally, the available budget and the number of account representative personnel still need to be improved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Plum-X Analityc

References

Affandi, M. E. (2021). Urgensi Penyeragaman Pola Komunikasi Account Representative Dan Perannya Dalam Peningkatan Efektivitas Pengawasan Kepatuhan Pajak. Scientax, 3(1), 29–50.

Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338.

Amilin, A. (2016). Peran Konseling, Pengawasan, Dan Pemeriksaan Oleh Petugas Pajak Dalam Mendorong Kepatuhan Wajib Pajakdan Dampaknya Terhadap Penerimaan Negara. Jurnal Akuntansi, 20(2), 285–300.

Ayalew, E. (2014). Factors Affecting tax audit effectiveness: A study on category ‘A’Taxpayers in Bahir Dar City Administration Revenue Office. Unpublished Thesis, Masters of Science in Accounting and Finance, Bahir Dar University.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Chalu, H., & Mzee, H. (2018). Determinants of tax audit effectiveness in Tanzania. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(1), 35–63.

Dewi, M. K., Manochin, M., & Belal, A. (2021). Towards a conceptual framework of beneficiary accountability by NGOs: An Indonesian case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 80, 102130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102130

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2021). Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Pajak 2020.

Drogalas, G., Ioannis, S., Dimitra, K., & Ioannis, D. (2015). Tax audit effectiveness in Greek firms: Tax auditors’ perceptions. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 7 (7).

Imam Gunawan. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori & Praktik. Bumi Aksara.

Indraswono, C. (2019). Pengaruh Jumlah Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi dan Badan terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Indonesia dengan Kepatuhan Pelaporan Pajak sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Modus, 31(2), 120–138.

Isa, K., & Pope, J. (2011). Corporate tax audits: Evidence from Malaysia. Global Review of Accounting and Finance, 2(1), 42–56.

Kamaruddin, K., Faisal, A., & Agustam, M. R. (2022). The Effect of Tax Audit, Tax Collection, and Taxpayer Compliance Supervision on Increasing Tax Revenue at KPP Pratama Makassar Utara. Golden Ratio of Taxation Studies, 2(1), 36–46.

Khairani, E. C., & Utomo, S. W. (2021). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Berbasis Wilayah Di KPP Pratama Batu. Educoretax, 1(2), 82–103.

Mears, C. L. (2009). Interviewing for education and social science research: The gateway approach. Springer.

Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2009). Encyclopedia of case study research. Sage publications.

OECD. (2023). Revenue Statistics 2022: The Impact of COVID-19 on OECD Tax Revenues.

Putri, C. A. (2022, July 19). Sadar Rasio Pajak RI Masih Rendah, Sri Mulyani Lakukan Ini. CNBC Indonesia.

Raden, H. (2021). Kompetensi Komunikasi “Account Representative” dalam Melakukan Pengawasan Kepatuhan Perpajakan Wajib Pajak di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Medan Timur [Doctoral dissertation]. niversitas Sumatera Utara.

Redaksi DDTCNews. (2023, January 5). Lakukan Pengawasan Berbasis Kewilayahan 2023, Ini Kata Dirjen Pajak. DDTC News.

Sari, D. K., Fitrianty, R., & Rahayu, S. (2022). Pengaruh Edukasi, Pengawasan Dan Pemeriksaan Pajak Terhadap Peningkatan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Di KPP Pratama Surabaya Genteng. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 6304–6320.

Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M., & Christian, C. (2001). Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. Journal of Public Economics, 79(3), 455–483.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syahlan, D. R. (2021). Evaluasi efektivitas pemeriksaan pajak studi kasus pada KPP Pratama Bengkulu Dua [Tesis]. Universitas Indonesia.

Wildan, M. (2022, November 21). Dilebur atau Tidaknya Jabatan AR dan Pemeriksa Tergantung Ini. DDTC NEws.

Yap, M., & Mulyani, S. D. (2022). Pengaruh pelayanan, pengawasan dan pemeriksaan pajak terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak badan yang dimoderasi digitalisasi administrasi perpajakan. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 9(1), 37–54.